6
INTRODUCTORY
Greeks called a ‘swallow’, will agree that the latter is
the more accurate description. Or again, what exactness
of perception must have been possessed by the architects and
- workmen to whom we owe the pillars which, seen from below,
appear perfectly straight, but, when measured, are found to
bulge out {’¿vrao-is).
A still more essential fact is that the Greeks were a race of
thinkers. It was not enough for them to know the fact (the
on); the} 7 wanted to know the why and wherefore (the Sia tl),
and they never rested until they were able to give a rational
explanation, or what appeared to them to be such, of every
fact or phenomenon. The history of Greek astronomy fur
nishes a good example of this, as well as of the fact that no
visible phenomenon escaped their observation. We read in
Cleomedes 1 that there were stories of extraordinary lunar
eclipses having been observed which ‘ the more ancient of the
mathematicians ’ had vainly tried to explain; the supposed
‘ paradoxical ’ case was that in which, while the sun appears
to be still above the western horizon, the eclipsed moon is
seen to rise in the east. The phenomenon was seemingly
inconsistent with the recognized explanation of lunar eclipses
as caused by the entrance of the moon into the earth’s
shadow ; how could this be if both bodies were above the
horizon at the same time? The ‘more ancient’ mathemati
cians tried to- argue that it was possible that a spectator
standing on an eminence of the spherical earth might see
along the generators of a cone, i.e. a little downwards on all
sides instead of merely in the plane of the horizon, and so
might see both the sun and the moon although the latter was
in the earth’s shadoV. Cleomedes denies this, and prefers to
regard the whole story of such cases as a fiction designed
merely for the purpose of plaguing astronomers and philoso
phers ; but it is evident that the cases had actually been
observed, and that astronomers did not cease to work at the
problem until they had found the real explanation, namely
that the phenomenon is due to atmospheric refraction, which
makes the sun visible to us though it is actually beneath the
horizon. Cleomedes himself gives this explanation, observing
that such cases of atmospheric refraction were especially
1 Cleomedes, De motn circulari, ii. 6, pp. 218 sq.