GVII-82
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING
simplified delineation of sharp subdivision
lines, recognizing the complexity of the
landscape associations which affect man.
The geologist can draw sharp lines with
impunity, but not the human geographer,
who must recognize the blending of influ
ences and draws his lines to represent
transitions where there is a correspondence
of many factors.
The Terrain Type and the
Air Photo
The earlier land classification surveys
were made by ground methods, but as air
photography became available photo in
terpretation was gradually adopted as a
tool. It was an ideal combination of theory
and practice because the air photo was
especially well suited to show spacial rela
tionships and the multitude of details
which make up the elements of terrain.
In practice the terrain type is remark
ably flexible and can be broadened to the
regional level or narrowed down to show
great detail, depending upon almost any
criteria. It can involve any combination
of features which are associated together
and which are repeated again and again
over the landscape. It can include such
specialized groupings as forest cover types
and crop classifications, or broad types
such as lands suitable for settlement and
those to be reserved as wild lands. Prob
ably the outstanding advantages of the
terrain type technique are the ease with
which most types can be recognized on air
photos, and the relative environmental ho
mogeneity of the type, which permits spe
cific interpretations of ground conditions
to be made.
The terrain type method has been
widely used for the classification of ter
rain for military purposes. Best known of
these applications is the world wide
Strategic Engineering Survey made by
the U. S. Geological Survey for the U. S.
Army Engineers. It classified geographical
regions into broad terrain types which
could be related to trafficability and
construction problems.
Physiographic Subdivision and the
Air Photo
All geographers did not adopt the classi
fication of land by types, however. Fenne-
man’s system of multiple physiographic
subdivision has seen wide application,
especially by physical geographers, who
used it as a tool for geographic description.
The broad description of regions seems to
be the best use to which it can be put and
it has been widely successful. Physio
graphic subdivisions have also been used in
military intelligence surveys, one of which
was the Joint Army Navy Intelligence
Study of worldwide coverage during World
War II. Geographic regions were deline
ated on topographic lines, then subdivided,
and a description was supplied for each
area. However, the technique has rarely
been used in photo interpretation stud
ies, principally because it is a tool for
generalized descriptions of regions, and
not for the analysis of spot locations. The
air photo is not a generalization except at
the smallest scales. At operational scales
it inescapably narrows the field of interest
very quickly to specific images. Physio
graphic subdivisions, as broad generaliza
tions, have heterogeneous elements and
many diverse conditions, making it im
possible to use their descriptions to analyze
specific sites. For instance, if a subdivision
contains high mountains, plateaus and
deep basins it is difficult to make generaliza
tions which will fit any particular site.
Such subdivisions usually cannot be
recognized on air photography because of
this diversity.
Examples
Geographic problems are difficult to
examine in the abstract and examples
seem to be essential for understanding.
Regional photo interpretation keys have
been used in the following illustrations
as the vehicle for regional analysis. Al
though the regional key is still in a devel
opmental stage, it has already proved itself
an extremely effective means for analyzing
the geographic associations of a region.
The two keys used herein are fragmentary
and are only intended to show how each
example keys out one of its end products,
so that they may be compared.
The Fenneman approach has been
adapted to photo interpretation, and it is
demonstrated by keying out the Navajo
Section of the Colorado Plateau shown in
Plates 1 through 4. In addition single
representative oblique photos 1 are used to
1 The author is indebted to the Air Chart &
Information Center of the U. S. Air Force for
the trimetrogon photography used here, and to
the Division of Forest Economics, U. S. Forest
Service, for help in preparing the plates.