+2
E
Such residual errors cause also some differences between the
machine values and the ground values of the co-ordinates of the control
points. The knowledge of these differences and a random check of the
precision of identification, eventually done by repetition of plotting,
would give a sufficient security for checking the plotting. For this stage
of work too, all field measurement destined to determine the differences
between real distances and plotted distances ought to be abolished and
this method is still considered by many people as revolutionary, but in
practice used by photogrammetric surveyors. Some tests give an
increasing of the planimetric differences; the distance between two
points, when this distance increases.
If such a law has been verified by tests, this is due to the pro-
gressive error made by the tester, not by the executor. The tester
certainly will have made his measurements by using tacheometric
methods or by surveyors staffs, where the probability and the magnitude
of the error increases with the measured distance. On the contrary, in
photogrammetry, when the points belong to the same stereogram, there
may be a greater or lesser error with their position, but only in function
of their less or greater distance in respect of the control points.
If, on the contrary, the points belong to different stereograms, also
if really their reciprocal distance is smaller than those we have consi-
dered between points of the same stereogram, we may notice much
greater errors due to a not sufficiently accurate connection of the overlap
of the two stereograms. (Schermerhorn-Witt: Photogrammetry for
cadastral survey - Ph. X/2).
À rational method to test surveys made by means of photogram-
metry for large scale maps, could include: test, done following the
classie criteria, of the planning operations which follows the classic
methods of triangulation and levelling; check of the preparation of the
photograms and of their orientation, based on the measurement of the
precision attained in the re-establishement of the control point co-ordina-
tes; check of the connection between neighbour stereograms, based on
the repetition of the determination of the machine co-ordinates of the
common points between the two stereograms; check of the precision of
identification, based on the repetition of the plotting in the most
doubtful points of the stereogram; eventual check, by sight, of the
accuracy of the reconnaissance; check of the preservation of the
characteristics and of the adjustment of the taking cameras and of the
plotting apparatus. The most part of these checks could be made
without sending technicians to the fields.