of suitability in the same way as that of
cumulative method.
Once the suitability map was
prepared based on the information on
ground water, soil and slope; it was
compared with land use map to see the
correlation. Then the same layer was
intersected with the land use map after
assigning due weights to the land use
classes. Both cumulative and multiplication
methods were adopted and regrouped into
suitability classes in the same way as
earlier. Thus overall land suitability map
GSSLUL was prepared. In both the
analysis apart from the above layers,
lineament map (fractures) was also
considered. A buffer zone of 75m on
either side of the lineament was generated
and weight 3 was assigned to this zone and
other area are ignored for assigning the
weights. [Lineaments referred here are
basically geological fractures which are
weak zones in the country rock, and are
found to have good ground water prospects.
These lineaments are tapped through
dug/bore wells and the water available are
used for irrigation on either side. The
approximate area which can be irrigated by
the water drawn from the wells on these
lineaments is around 75m on either side of
the lineament. Since the ground water
prospects of lineaments in the study area is
moderate to good that means it can yield
good but not very high quantity water,
weight 3 was assigned]. This buffered
lineament map was intersected with both
GSSL and GSSLUL.
Alur taluk comprises about 78 km?
of wasteland (land unutilised, under
utilised, degraded, etc.), the majority of
which are cultivable. Hence, suitability of
wasteland with respect to soil, slope,
ground water and lineament has been
assessed. Wasteland map was integrated
with ground water, slope, soil and
lineament maps and the suitability of
wasteland classes were assessed using the
weights assigned earlier to different classes
of these layers (Table-2). Later, using both
cumulative and multiplication methods
these were regrouped into seven suitability
classes, as earlier.
102
5. RESULTS/DISCUSSION
5.1 Land Suitability
Layers generated by both
multiplication and cumulation were
compared to see which method gives the
better result. It was found that layers
generated by both the methods look almost
alike except where tank and steep slope
area are present (Table-3 and 4). The layer
generated by multiplication showed
unsuitable class more clearly. The reason
is, in this method, if one class of a layer is
unsuitable i.e. weight is zero, irrespective
of corresponding classes in other layers
having different weights, the effective
weight becomes zero. Whereas in
cumulative method, it is not the case.
The layer GSSL was compared with
the land use map to see the correlation
between the land use classes and the
suitability. It was found that good
correlation exist between the land use and
the suitability of land. The same is
depicted in the Table-5. The analysis of
GSSL showed that whole Alur taluk is
more to most suitable (i.e. 49% more
suitable and 32% most suitable). While
about 14% of falling under class - suitable,
only 0.56% and 0.05% are less and least
suitable respectively (Table-3).
Once the land use map was
integrated with GSSL, it is observed that
there is no significant change in suitability
classes as such. This is because there is a
good correlation between the current land
use and the land suitability and the
percentage-wise suitability classes are given
in Table-3. The final land suitability map
(GSSLUL) was carefully observed and
the broad type of cultivation is suggested
(Table-6). Surface waterbodies, barren
rocks and steep slope areas are classified as
unsuitable. The final land suitability map
showed that valleys controlled by fractures
are the highly suitable areas, valleys being
the next best suitable class.
5.2 Suitability of Wastelands
In Alur taluk about 18.09% of the
total geographical area falls under
wastela;
of tota
scrub/d
under [
(2%), c
Out of
cultivab
wastelai
soil, sl
assessec
wastelai
cultivat
o Thi
too!
o The
maj
cult
cur)
the
cur]
und
are;
o The
cun
sho
in t
one
7.
/
Radhakr
Shri S
Sensing
Bangalo:
providin
suggesti
Dr. J t
for his
commen
Enginee
Manager
Remote
Manager
Applicat
helped ii
assistanc
highly aj