‘y well
nks to
ther
of
id
ill
Maghed Marghany
OPERATIONALIZATION OF SAR POLARIZED DATA FOR ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL EROSION
Maged Marghany and Tjeerd W. Hobma
International Institute For Aerospace Survey
and Earth Science (ITC)
Division of Applied Geomorphological Surveys
PO Box 6
7500 AA Enschede
The Netherlands
maged G itc.nl
hobma@itc.nl
Keywords: Operationalization, Polarised SAR data, Coastal erosion, Canny algorithm.
ABSTRACT
This study introduces a new approach for operationalization of SAR polarized data on coastal
erosion studies. Polarized TOPSAR and ERS-1 data are used for this purpose. ERS-1 data was
acquired on the 8^ August 1993 and polarized TOPSAR data was acquired on the 6^ December
1996. A quasi-linear model and a new model based on the Canny algorithm were used to model
shoreline changes. Digitized vector layers of shoreline change were used to examine the accuracy
of the model results. This study shows that the results of the Canny algorithm has a good correlation
with the results from the quasi-linear model. The Canny algorithm can successfully be used for
automatic detection of shoreline change. In conclusion, the integration between the quasi-linear
model and the Canny algorithm model enables further operationalization of SAR data for coastal
erosion studies.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Coastal erosion studies from ‘space are still in an early stage. Most studies that have been done by
using remotely sensed data are restricted to the application of classical methods of shoreline
identification based on digitizing and overlaying methods. These methods induce high rates of error
and require a lot of time to process the data. In this process, the sum of thematic errors and
digitizing errors account for the low accuracy of the interpretation results. This often results in
inadequate solutions of the problems for coastal engineers and decision makers. For instance, Raj
(1982); Mazlan et al., (1989), and Frighy et al., (1994) used different historical data of satellite
imagery, aerial photography and topographic maps for coastal erosion studies. Most of these
Studies found an unrealistic high rate of erosion of more than 50 m/year. For instance, Frighy et al.,
(1995) found the rate of erosion in the Nile Delta to be —70.8 m/year. However, if this rate really
had occurred, it would have caused the destruction of all the infrastructures, such as roads and
bridges near the coastal waters. Furthermore, Frighy et al., (1995) stated that there is a significant
relation between shoreline change, estimated from Landsat TM, aerial photography and ground
Surveys with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.93. This can not be considered as a significant result,
due to the fact that a significant statistical test such as ANOVA or the t-test have not been
performed. In addition, the low resolution of the Landsat data (30 m) only justifies its use in coastal
érosion studies with changes that are larger than this pixel size. As a matter of fact, the resolution of
this sensor is unable to capture beach profiles at a width less than the pixel size (< 30m). The high
resolution of SPOT PAN (10 m) and radar data such as from ERS-1 (12.5 m), Radarsat (12.5 m)
and AIRSAR/TOPSAR (ca. 10 m) enables us to solve this type of problem.
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B1. Amsterdam 2000. 201