International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004
12% of the unfiltered one, and in the Downstream site into 27%
(Figure 14). This result shows that the incorporation of spatial
dependence of elevation error reduces the estimated error of
slope.
—*— DownUnfilt
-- UpUnfilt
20 -—* - DownFilt
-—G- UpFil
Slope RMSE
4 6 8 10...12 14 16 #820 22
Initial DEM RMSE
Figure 14. Effects of spatial dependence on slope RMSE
5. CONCLUSION
The increase of initial DEM uncertainty affects the increase of
derived-slope uncertainty following a linear trend although for
the higher resolution (5 m), the trend appears to be curvilinear,
as the slope of the graph is smaller for the higher initial DEM
RMSE. The slope uncertainty is larger in the Downstream site
than in the Upstream site because the effects of similar
magnitude of error to the original elevation variability are
stronger in flat area than in undulating area.
Slope RMSE increases by the increase of resolution (smaller
cell size), which means that with a similar magnitude of error
indicated, higher slope uncertainty occurs in higher resolution
slope grids. This result shows the importance of choosing the
optimum resolution so as to minimize big slope uncertainty.
And as the result shows that higher slope uncertainty occurs in
the flat area than in the undulating area, the decision of
resolution is more crucial if the terrain under study is relatively
flat than if it is undulating.
The approach which considers that elevation error is random
shows that initial DEM uncertainty affects derived-slope
uncertainty in a much higher degree than if elevation error is
considered spatially-dependent. Assuming that error is spatially-
dependent, error propagation from DEM to the slope error
occurs in a lower magnitude compared to the propagation when
error is considered random. And the magnitude of the reduction
is bigger in the undulating terrain than in the flat terrain.
This study is still in the preliminary stage, a few points for
further improvement are considered important to note:
1. With the spatial dependence assumption, the relationship
between the spatial dependence of elevation and that of the
error is yet to be studied further. The question should be
whether spatial dependence of elevation error is linearly
correlated with that of the elevation.
2. Comparison of slope RMSE obtained as the DEM-derived
feature with that obtained from field observation may result
in a different magnitude of uncertainty.
3. For overall outcomes of erosion and river flow, the
frequency distribution of slopes, and thus of the error, is
important to assess. However for spatially-explicit
intervention, the demand is on the location aspects of the
error/uncertainty.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The overall watershed-function project by ICRAF Indonesia in
Way Besai watershed is funded by Australian Centre for
International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). Authors would
like to thank Meine van Noordwijk and Sonya Dewi for their
inputs and field staff and students who helped in data collection.
REFERENCES
GPS Tutor Website, 1998.
http://www.mercat.com/QUEST/gpstutor.htm
Holmes, K.W., Chadwick O.A., Kyriakidis, P.C., 2000. Error in
a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on
terrain modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 233, pp. 154-173
Hunter, G. and Goodchild, M., 1997. Modeling the uncertainty
of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases.
Geographical Analysis, 29(1), pp. 35-49.
Hunter, G., and Goodchild, M., 1995. Dealing with error in
spatial databases: a simple case study. Photogrammetric
Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61(5), pp. 529-537
Jorgensen, S E. 1994. Fundamentals of Ecological Modelling
(2nd edition). Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 628.
PCRaster Environmental Software, PCRaster version 2 Manual,
Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, The
Netherlands. http://pcraster.geog.uu.nl/
The Idrisi Project, 2000. /DRISI32 Help, Clark University, USA
Verbist, B.J.P., Widayati, A. van Noordwijk, M., 2003. The link
between land and water prediction of sediment point sources in
a previous forested watershed in Lampung, Sumatra - Indonesia.
D. Post (Ed.) - MODSIM proceedings, Townsville , Australia
Wechsler, S. P., 2000. Effect of DEM Uncertainty on
Topographic Parameters, DEM Scale and Terrain Evaluation,
State University of New York College of Environmental
Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, USA.
1018
KEY
ABS
of ov
oper:
asses
mana
VHR
repro
level
prodi
Exist
evalu
helpi
outec
purpx
Very
sourc
data.
many
(imag
with
with
of El
farm:
the a
appli
requi
Euro,
criter
RMS
T
pancl
conte
deliv
distar
numb
accur
(com
orbite
for C
(orth«
accur
into
from
distor