! 2004
iS
it.
gs
he
he
ion
em
1C€
1ed
the
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004
generalization process in the form of rules, several authors have
proposed and used constraints in the generalization process (e.g.
Brassel & Weibel 1988, Ruas & Plazanet 1996, Harrie 1999,
Ruas 2000). In this study, the generalization process is
controlled by the power of objects. These powers have been
determined and thus affect and act according to the process
rules. The forces that are "developed" in each object as a result
of the powers action are "translated" according to its value and
direction to suit the generalization operator in respect to the
process constraints.
3.1 Object Power Determination
An analogy to the interaction among a large number of objects
can be found in electric field theory. In an electric field each
"object" acts according to its power, affects its neighbors and is
in turn affected by them. In this study, it is suggested to
implement the electric field theory, assuming that the map
generalization process will be based on "powers" of the map's
features affecting each other. The “power” is determined as a
function of the object’s properties, location, and the surrounding
area and objects. The action of the power’ action controls the
object’s behavior, thus it has to be calculated carefully, taking
into account all affecting elements.
Object Properties
The aim of this research is to establish a model for a “combined
generalization”, where the powers are calculated and
determined in order to be able to highlight the different qualities
of each individual object. The area is a very important element
in such a process; since a bigger object has a higher power
value. Different objects have different factors under the
cartographic rules (e.g., trees might be moved easier than
buildings). According to the map type each object has its
relative importance value (e.g. in a tourist map hotels will be
more highlighted than private houses). In a similar manner, high
buildings should be "stronger" than low buildings, and the
process prefers not to change their shape or move their location.
Square buildings should be "stronger" than rectangular or
elongated ones.
In analogy to the electric field theory, the power contained in
each object will be calculated as a function of the following
object properties:
1. Area: calculated at the scale of the map (size of the
plotted object or its plotted symbol).
Shape: calculated as a function of the compactness,
solidity, and second axes moment ratio:
N
solidity * compactness
(8) Ishape — Sodan Campacmess
ratio
max(7,.,/ os )
(9) ratio =
I
min(Z. 74
3. Height: a normalized value, given to 2D objects like
roads, and single story houses. The value is increased
for multistory buildings.
4. Type: an elastic value for each object describing its
"material" according cartographic rules and map
content.
5. Importance in the map: normalized values according
to the map type.
213
Area Surrounding an Object
The area surrounding an object affects its behavior as well.
Objects can be located in a dense urban area, or "isolated" in a
rural area. Objects with a higher density value resulting from
more objects in the surrounding area should be "stronger" being
practically unable to change their shape or moved from their
location.
The values of all these elements were chosen in proportion to
the expected power (larger values vs. larger power), and
therefore, the power can be calculated as follows:
(10) power = area * shape * hieght * elastic * Im por tan ce * density
3.2 Forces between Objects
The forces between neighboring objects express the interaction
between them. Returning to the electric field theory, each object
has its "electric charge”, and attraction or rejection forces
control their movements. When adopting the same behavior or
interaction model, the forces between the objects in the map are
computed as follows:
C D D)
R 2
a.b
(11) Force, , =
The force between two objects is a direct function of the
difference between both powers. Thus, the same style and
power objects won't affect each other. However, there is an
inverse function expressing the distance between the objects and
their effect, with close objects having a stronger effect.
3.2.1 Minimal Distance between Neighboring Objects
It was determined that the approach should be to calculate the
distance between objects as the minimal distance between the
convex hulls circumscribing the objects as shown in Figure 6.
x 10°
P
1,8024}
1.8023
1.8022
1.8021}
|
1.802}
1 ans)
1.8018]
i
1.8017 +
i
|
18018;
1015]
rm He vus ab e RADAR en des D
1.2262 1.2282 1.2282 1.2262 12263 1.2263 1.2263 1.2263
£
x10
Figure 6. Minimum distance between convex hulls
3.2.2 Direction of Forces between Objects
The critical zones in a map are located where there is minimum
distance between neighboring objects, especially if that distance
causes a spatial conflict. The goal of the combined