Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 4)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004 
  
building area [m?] | height [m] | length [m] | width [m] 
type 
  
One- 90-115 3-8.5 13-15 
family 
house 
  
row-house 60-110 3-8.5 8-12 
  
small 90-160 6-12 10-17 
more- 
family 
house 
  
large 140-280 10-18 14-24 10-16 
more- 
family 
house 
  
  
tower 280-900 27-60 20-75 17-30 
block 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 3: Adapted values 
This method needs a lot of manual processing and therefore is 
very time-consuming. Furthermore, it has to be adapted to 
different settlement types of a city, e.g. the values differ from 
city centre to suburban area. 
4.2 Clustering 
In the second approach we use an unsupervised classification 
method, namely clustering for the automatic search of groups 
with similar attributes. Instead of adjusting the values to 
classify most of the buildings, all buildings are used and every 
building is assigned to a cluster. 
[n this step we used the program package WEKA (WEKA, 
2000). The table 4 shows the mean value and the standard 
deviation for some clusters. 
After all the buildings are assigned to a cluster, each cluster has 
to be assigned to the appropriate building type. This is less 
time-consuming than the iterative method described in 4.1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Cluster | Height Area Length Width | Building 
[m] [m?] [m] [m] Type 
Mean Mean Mean Mean 
(StdDev) | (StdDev) | (StdDev) | (StdDev) 
0 3.78 20.42 5.85 3.74 Garage 
(1.04) (3.08) (2.64) (2.10) 
1 10.58 253.69 19.94 15.23 LMFH 
(2.07) (19.44) (1.56) (0.90) 
2 14.31 177.74 18.10 10.36 LMFH 
(2.40) (15.85) | (0.92) (0.89) 
3 9.82 174.50 17.20 10.30 LMFH 
(1.10) (14.81) (1.19) (0.70) 
12 7.33 125.10 13.10 10.60 SMFH 
(1.47) 0561) 10:37) (0.71) 
13 8.46 91.64 10.74 8.96 SMFH 
(0.40) (4.91) (0.39) (0.15) 
18 41.27 368.42 25.65 18.39 Tower 
(4.79) (13.70) |(1.41) (0.91) block 
Table 4: Cluster and assigned building types. 
This method also delivers a more detailed building typology 
because different characteristics for the same building type are 
considered. 
718 
Figure 4 shows an example of the clustering On the left are 
blocks of large more-family houses. In the upper left corner are 
one-family houses (pale red). On the right are office buildings 
and stores. 
    
Len, S um NS ee i, LU p Ta, c fd 
€ T oi MV. abs Be Be, © < AREAS 
A PR Bret CIS Mq. 
ia Le LEA AI uf e 2 s "A 
- “9 MAS ve v : 
" PS E. P A | 7 M € 
in ads A VAM 5%, 
Bee AN x. 
$ De Ç 3 g : 
Se EN 5 504 px 
it a +2 Se p, A 
d C CN v 22 
3 00039 SE) C d ANS GA y 
de) æ vo a. AN S 
d Ss c A 
VAN NOS 
WO wo DR 9 
S 
2 
= 2m 
EKD AN 
A E 
Figure 4: Results for the city centre of Stuttgart. 
It also reveals that there are larger areas with the same building 
types. 
5. IDENTIFYING SETTLEMENT TYPES 
The settlement types are composed of certain building types 
and they vary in density and the arrangement of buildings. 
To identify these different settlement types, clusters of objects 
with similar properties and characteristic spatial distribution 
have to be found. One possibility to do so is to use spatial 
clustering (Anders, 2002). Here, not only the similarity between 
the object is taken into account, but also the similarity in the 
spatial density. Also here, however, the final assignment to a 
certain settlement type has to be done manually after the 
automatic clustering. 
The other possibility is to use information from ATKIS. The 
streets separate the surface into many small areas. Mostly these 
small areas coincide with the building blocks. Furthermore, 
these areas are assigned specific settlement types. Depending 
on this type and further block characteristics, e.g. building 
types, density or average distance to road, the assignment t0 
settlement types from the settlement typology can be done. 
Then neighbouring blocks with similar characteristics can be 
merged. 
6. RESULTS 
Figure 5 shows the result of our method using laser scanning, 
ground plans from ALK and specific heat coefficients from the 
building typology. Figure 6 shows the heat demand from af 
existing heat atlas. The values differ about 10 to 20 per cent. 
Internati 
i s 
MV 
& — ; - | f" MW o 2^". 
  
Figure 5 
AF où Uu e A A E NS ASS 
  
. Figure 6:
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.