2004
tor,
the
the
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004
Unit: pixel(p) and meter(m)
Method — vcx/p vey/p Vex/m Vcy/m Vcz/m
LS 2.24 2.23 7.38 7.29 10.13
Stein 1.65 1.52 5.48 5.07 4.57
HK 1.62 1.49 5.49 4.97 4.52
LW 921.67 140.75 2432.58 837.9 50.45
GR 1.61 1.43 5.39 4.88 4.50
CRS 1.41 1.33 4.47 4.34 4.39
Table 4. Test results at check points for Image 02
Table I,Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 show that the CRS
estimator is the most accurate, for both 10 meter resolution
SPOT 1 image and 2.5 resolution SPOT 5 image the orientation
precision at directional points is within one pixel and that at
control points is with one and a half pixels. The next best
estimators are the stein estimator, the ordinary ridge estimator
with Horel-Kennad approach and the generalized ridge
estimator, about one pixel accurate at directional points and two
pixels accurate at check points. Among these three next best
estimators the generalized ridge is slightly better than the
ordinary ridge estimator with Horel-Kennad approach, and the
latter is slightly better than the stein estimator. The least square
estimator and the ordinary ridge estimator with Lawless-Wang
approach are the worst, unstable and inaccurate.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the ridge-stein estimator is
the most accurate, reliable and stable approach for linear
pushbroom imagery orientation.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The strong correlation among exterior orientation elements of
linear pushbroom imagery causes the normal equation ill-
conditioned and least squares estimation values no longer
optimal. The new biased estimator, the combined ridge-stein
estimator can effectively overcome the ill-conditioned problem
and improve orientation precision. Experimental results confirm
that the CRS estimator is superior to the least square estimator,
the ridge estimator and the stein estimator in accuracy,
reliability and stability. The combined ridge-stein estimator is a
perfect approach for linear pushbroom imagery orientation.
REFERENCES
Gui, Q. M., Li, G. Z., 2002. Combined ridge with shrunken
estimator and its application in geodetic adjustment. Journal of
Geodesy and Geodynamics, 22(1), pp. 16-21.
Guo, H.T., Zhang, B. M., Gui Q.M., 2002. Application of
generalized ridge estimation in computing the exterior
orientation elements of satellitic linear array scanner imagery.
In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote
Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Xi'an, China, Vol.
XXXIV, Part 2, pp. 153-156.
Gupta, R., Hartley, R., 1997. Linear pushbroom cameras. /EEE
Trans. PAMI, 19(9), pp.963-975.
Huang W. B., 1992. Modern Adjustment Theory and lts
Application, Beijing Publishing House, Beijing, pp.120 -132.
731
Zhang, F. R., Wang X. Q., 1989. Ridge and stein estimation for
adjustment parameters. Journal of Wuhan Technical University
of Surveying and Mapping, 14(3), pp. 46-57.