Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 4)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
    
N 
Rose diagram 19 
NW. NE 
We Y3 
SW: SE 
Aspect 
  
pointing downslope 
Figure 9. Rose-diagram of Valles 
Marineris. 
Figure 8. The computed gradient for the study area (top image). Aspect 
(bottom image) standardized to the 8 directions defined in a raster image 
(Figure 7), the black was used for flat terrain (if gradient « 2 aspect is 
considered undefined). 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
e Aspect rose diagrams are completely different (Figures 7 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Aspect Number ou and 9) although the main axis of both features is parallel to 
Direction | of pixels Statistics the East to West direction. More specifically, the Grand 
Canyon terrain is developed mainly in a East to West 
E 126,468 = Mean 1468.9 direction that is parallel to the fluvial processes main 
NE 105,115 9 St.dev 384.7 direction while the residual tributary canyons occur in a 
N 96,206 S E | Maximum 2,703 North to South direction. 
NW 119,602 = Minimum 294 
W 136,523 HI 0.49 Aspect J Sumber statistics 
SW 110.128 Y TET Direction | of pixels 
1 L i 2an . 
ë te E 45.000 Mean 474 
S 92050 |] 5 St.dev 14.60 : g : 
8-3 : NE 79,469 1.2 St.dev 3,086 
SE 112,594 | s — Maximum Sn ; 
o - N 101,416 | 9 £ | Maximum 6,925 
Flat < 2 147.252 [OC Minimum 75 o _ 
NW 45,356 | om Minimum -5,749 
W 38,213 HI 0.41 
Table 1. Geomorphometric signature of Grand Canyon SW 74,479 n Mean 9.89 
S 100,076 | © _ | St.dev 9.0 
The overall comparison of the two features (Grand Canyon S € e IT 
: eri heic nf : : I SE 51,093 & —| Maximum 53 
versus Valles Marineris) on the basis of the corresponding = es 5 
geomorphometric attributes (Tables | and 2) indicates the Flat « 2 139622 Minimum 0 
following: 
e. Grand Canyon is more massive since the HI (hypsometric 
integral) is greater. 
e Grand Canyon is much more steep than 
e Valles Marineris chasma that presents greater variability of 
relief with respect to both the standard deviation of 
elevation and the local relief (elevation difference) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 2. Geomorphometric signature of Valles Marineris 
On the contrary in Valles Marineris chasma the landscape is 
developed mainly in a North to South direction that is vertical 
to the huge elongated mountain ranges that are evident with the 
chasma. This means that the landscape flow away from the 
  
e Valles Marineris presents remarkable straightness of 
: ; i mountain fronts and not parallel to a supposed fluvial processes 
mountain fronts in comparison to Grand Canyon. 
along the West to East direction. In other words the process 
responsible for the shape of the rectilinear mountain fronts 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.