Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 4)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004 
2.1 Control point network 
The earlier control point work for Dione (Davies and 
Katayama, 1983) involved image point measurements in 27 
Voyager-1 images (1-16 km per pixel) and one Voyager-2 
image (5 km per pixel) to determine the latitudes and 
longitudes of 126 ground control points. Along with the 
2D-coordinates of the control points Davies and Katayama 
determined the radius of Dione and defined the position of 
the prime meridian. 
We re-computed this control point network using a subset of 
15 Voyager-1 images with resolutions better than 9 
km/pixel and the one Voyager-2 image. Within our 
calculations, the position of the prime meridian was fixed at 
the value determined by Davies and Katayama (1983). 
However, rather than determining the latitudes and 
longitudes of the control points only, we solved for the full 
3D-coordinates (X, Y, Z) of each control point (Zeitler and 
Oberst, 1999: Oberst and Schuster, 2004). This approach 
potentially allowed us to determine a higher-order figure of 
Dione beyond the sphere. 
Over all, there were 135 points (Fig. 1) that were measured in 
the 16 images. The total number of image point 
measurements was 1482. Image coordinates were converted 
to mm on the focal plane using established camera 
calibration data (Table 2). Due to the fact that the surface 
areas of Dione were mapped at different image resolutions 
(see the varying detail across the map) the ability to identify 
points was strongly affected. As a result, the distribution of 
the points is far from uniform, with a broad point gap to the 
west and poor coverage towards the poles. 
Using bundle block adjustments, we determined the surface 
coordinates of the control points. Image point measurements 
and the camera pointing data were introduced as 
observations with standard deviations of 9 micro m and | 
mrad, respectively. The camera positions were taken fixed at 
their nominal values. In addition, Dione's center of figure 
was introduced as a ground control point with X=Y=Z=0. 
This center of figure was determined from the position of the 
limb, which was measured by a limb-fitting program. 
5 
  
  
Liege [7] 
Intern 
The limb was clearly visible in most Dione images. The X. 
Y-. and Z-coordinates of the control points and the three 
pointing angles of each image were treated as unknowns and 
were solved for. 
As a result of the block adjustment we obtained mean point 
accuracies of 1.8 km, 2.9 km, and 1.2 km for X, Y, and Z 
respectively. The lowest point accuracies are 3.5 km, 6.8 km, 
and 2.5 km (X, Y, and Z) and belong to those points located 
only within the 5-9 km resolution images (Fig. 2). 
  
K, pix/mm 84.8214 
So, pix 500.5 
lo, pix 500.5 
f, mm VGRI-NAC 1500.19 
VGRI-WAC 200.465 
VGR2-NAC 1503.49 
VGR2-WAC 200.770 
  
  
Camera parameters are taken from standard navigation 
data files (http://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/naif.html) and refer 
to the geometrically corrected images 
Table 2: Voyager Camera Parameters 
  
2.2 Global Shape Fig. 2 
The 3D-coordinates of the control points allowed us to 
determine the global shape of Dione. The poor point 
coverage of the body (Fig. 1) suggests considering only 
very simple body models. Following methods described by 
Oberst and Schuster (2004), we performed least-squares fils 
to the data using a sphere, a 2-axial ellipsoid, and a 3-axial 
ellipsoid, taking into account the radial point errors as 
weights in the fitting (Fig. 3). In result we obtained a RM$ 
value of about 3 km in each case suggesting that a sphere 
described the shape of the body sufficient well, and that it 
was not meaningful to proceed to higher-order models. 
Within this model the radius of Dione was determined to be 
R=562.5 +/- 0.2 km consistent with R=560 (RMS=5 km) 
determined by Davies and Katayama (1983). 
3. DIC 
Image | 
satelliti 
Mimas, 
first re, 
data de 
Howev 
taken fi 
Fig. 1: Dione base map showing the distribution of the control points. 
880
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.