EVOLUTION OF DIGITAL GROUND SAR PROCESSING SYSTEMS
J.' Gredel,.H. Schröter
DFVLR, Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt
für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Federal Republic of Germany
Commision II
ABSTRACT
án increasing number of airborne and spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar
(SAR) systems are used for a variety of remote sensing applications and more
than 30 digital SAR processors have been developed worldwide since the launch
of SEASAT.
Presently there are four types of digital SAR processors, existing or under
development. Typical implementation concepts are:
* software on a general purpose computer, primarily used for algorithm
development and experimental purposes
. software on a minicomputer augmented by array processor(s), used for
experimental purposes as well as for operational tasks with low through-
put requirements
. multiprocessor systems designed for high throughput operational process-
ing
. hardware configurations for Real Time and Near Real Time processing
This paper presents the evolution of the different SAR processors in a retro-
Spective view and describes the actual status of all known ongoing develop-
ments based on a survey, that was updated periodically over the last three
years.
A cautious extrapolation of future processor development concludes the
paper.
1. INTRODUCTION
The development of digital SAR processing technology for civil application
has been triggered primarily by the first spaceborne L-band SAR carried on
the SEASAT satellite. Although appropriate digital processing systems were
not available during the lifetime of the satellite fAug./Oct. 1978), shortly
after several systems became operational and a variety of additional exper-
imental systems have been developed meanwhile.
À first survey of SAR processors was presented by Guignard (1981) and updated
later by Raney (1982) and Gredel (1982/83). The present paper finally con-
cludes the series of updates with latest available information. It has to be
seen in context with more detailed information prepared for this conference
(Working Group II-5). More than 30 different processing systems from 16
organisations in North America, Europe and Japan are briefly characterized in
terms of hardware configuration, algorithm, throughput and application.
Future plans are mentioned and references are given.
The relevant information has been compiled from questionnaires that were
returned from organisations known to develop or operate SAR processing sys-
tems.