ne of the
ments in
auses the
remotely
ve of this
| different
| change
bul, was
leveloped
jricultural
racteristic
red rapid
tion axes
d rapid
the rural
services.
| of the
gion was
5. Today,
accepted
protection
sion and
nplanned
eptember
)SAT TM
the study
nosaic of
The key
‘able 1.
LE
(a)
2.1.2. Image registration
As a first step all image data set were
registered geometrically to each other. A
topographic map (1:25 000 scale) is used as a
reference grid in the registration process.
Linear fit polynomial and cubic convolution
interpolation techniques were used to produce
the registered output image with a 0.5 pixel
registration accuracy.
2.1.3. Change detection techniques
A change in reflectance often indicates a
physical change on the ground. The changes
in reflectance registered from one area
between two points in time provide a key
information on land use/cover changes. There
are many digital change-detection techniques.
The most common used are ; image overlay,
image differencing, principal component
analysis, and classification comparisons.
1. /mage overlay : The simplest way to
produce a change image is a photographic
comparison of a single band of data from
the two (or more) dates. The image is
prepared by making a photographic three-
color composite showing the three dates in
separate color overlays. The colors in the
resulting image indicate the changes in
reflectance values between these dates
[Virag et a/, 1987].
2. Image difference : Another procedure is to
prepare temporal difference image by
subtracting the DN(digital number)'s for
one date from those of the other. The
difference in the areas of no change will be
very small and areas of change will reveal
larger positive or negative values [Lillesand
et al, 1987].
679
| (b)
Figure 1. Study area ; (a) 1984 Landsat image (band 3/2/1). (b) Aerial photograph (1994).
3. Principal component analysis : Principal
Component Analysis can be used to detect
and identify temporal change when
registered Landsat TM images are merged
and treated as a single data set.
[Ingebritsen et al, 1985] By this method, a
new set of coordinate axes was fitted to the
image data, choosing as the first new axis
or component would account for maximum
variance. Subsequent axes (components)
would account for smaller portions of the
remaining variance. Changes to be
anticipated were of two types: (/) those that
would extend over a substantial part of the
scene, such as changes in atmospheric
transmission and soil water status; (i)
those that were restricted to parts of the
scene, such as construction of roads,
destruction of green areas.
4. Classification comparisons : This method
involves independently classifying each
image, registering the results and locating
those pixels that have changed their
land cover classification between dates.
Successful application of this method
requires accurate classifications of both
scenes, so that differences between two
dates represent true differences in land
use rather than differences in classification
accuracy [Campbell, 1987].
3. Results
Image overlay In the simplest change
detection procedure, the single band change
image was prepared by color coding TM band
3 from the 1992 data as red and from the
1984 data as green from the 1990 data as
blue (Figure 2). Band 3 of the Landsat TM
image was selected because it provides the
best visual discrimination of rural-to-urban
land conversion among the land cover groups
in the study area. The industrial complex (a -
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996