Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring

  
  
  
  
MULTISPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSAT TM IMAGES BY NEURAL NETWORKS 
Ivica Martic 
Remote Sensing Laboratory, Zagreb, Croatia, 
Slobodan Ribarié 
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia 
Vladimir Kusan 
Faculty of Forestry, Zagreb, Croatia 
Commission VIL Working Group 4 
.KEY WORDS: Neural network, Back-propagation, Classification, Multispectral images, Remote sensing, Landsat TM. 
ABSTRACT 
This work presents the results of experiments with the use of artificial neural networks for land cover classification. The goal of this 
research was to examine the operation of back-propagation neural network and its application in the classification of remotely sensed 
data. A back-propagation network with one hidden layer is used to classify a Landsat TM image. The results are compared to Gaussian 
maximum likelihood classifier. We show that neural network is better in performing than the maximum likelihood classifier. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
The use of artificial neural networks in remote sensing is 
relatively new, dating back eight years. Traditionally, supervised 
classification of multispectral remote sensing images is 
performed by statistical classifiers. Parametric statistical 
classifiers, such as maximum likelihood, require that the data 
have a Gaussian distribution. It is theoretically optimal if the 
assumptions about the probability functions are correct (Bischof 
et al. 1992). Neural networks are distribution-free and there is no 
need for prior knowledge of the statistical distribution of the 
classes in the data. 
Few studies compared the back-propagation neural network 
classifier to statistical classifiers. (Benediktsson et al, 1990), and 
(Civco, 1991) found that the statistical classifiers are able to 
perform better, while (Bischof et al. 1992), (Heerman et al. 
1992), (Kanellopoulas et al. 1993) and (Liu et al. 1993) found 
that the classification obtained by neural networks is similar or 
better than one obtained by Gaussian maximum likelihood 
classifier. All these researches showed the usefulness of 
application of artificial neural networks in the analysis of data 
collected by remote sensors. 
In this research our primary goal has been to investigate the 
operation of back-propagation neural network and compare it 
with Gaussian maximum likelihood classifier. We have 
examined the various architectures of back-propagation neural 
networks ( by changing the number of nodes in a hidden layer) in 
order to find out the best one suitable for given Landsat TM 
scene. 
In this paper, we first discuss the fundementals of two classifiers: 
statistical (parametric) Gaussian maximum likelihood and neural 
network (non-parametric) back-propagation. The following 
sections present the data used in this work and their results. 
Finally, conclusions are given in the last section. 
2. METHODOLOGY 
2.1 Maximum Likelihood Classifier 
Bayes decision theory is a fundamental statistical approach to the 
problem of pattern classification. This approach is based on the 
376 
assumption that the decision problem is posed in probabilistic 
terms, and that all of the relevant probability values are known 
(Duda, Hart, 1973). The basic decision function for each pattern 
(class) o; is 
g,(x) = In p(x/w;) * In p(w;) (1) 
where p(x/ o ;) are the conditional densities and p(o ;) are 
a priori probabilities. When it is known or it is reasonable to 
assume that the conditional densities are Gaussian normal 
1 
p(x) = Gy pom de Au mj) UA (zr - m)] 2) 
where each density is completely specified by its mean vector 
m, and covariance matrix 2; which are defined as 
m, 7 Ej {x} (3) 
Zi = E; ec - m; Xa " n) | e 
where E; {e} denotes the expectation operator over the patterns 
of class c»; , the Equation (1) becomes: 
8;(x)=1n fw;)-= in 25 - inf; |-3[6- mj) = (x m) 
(5) 
Since the term (N/2)1n 22 does not depend on i it can be 
eliminated from the expression. If the a priori probabilities are 
assumed to be equal the first term can be ignored as well as the 
factor y 2. 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 
  
"- ($9 M" 1
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.