Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring

Methods 
nts from 
ation at 
980. A 
ehaviour. 
Chemical 
n, 1985. 
RR-Based 
Journal of 
|. 
ent of a 
cal Fluid 
Physics, 
ients with 
riment. J. 
1993. An 
tion of 
Between 
the GF8 
., 31, pp 
THE USE OF GAIN CONTROLLED DMSP/OLS DATA TO MAP URBAN/SUBURBAN AND INDUSTRIAL 
LAND CONVERSION IN THE UNITED STATES 
Imhoff, M. L. - NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, W. Lawrence and D. Stutzer - Bowie State 
University, Bowie, MD, USA, G. Petersen, and E. Nizeyimana - The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 
USA, and C. Elvidge, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA 
KEY WORDS: DMSP/OLS, Gain Control, 
Urban/suburban, Land Conversion, United States 
ABSTRACT 
Nighttime data sets from the Defense Meteorological 
Satellite Program's Operational Linescan System 
(DMSP/OLS) have been used to map the location and extent 
of human settlements through the detection of "city lights". 
Data products from the DMSP/OLS have been used in their 
raw form and in the form of composites produced by 
compiling multiple data sets:over a period of time. The full 
utility of DMSP for urban mapping applications, however, 
has been limited by the differences in OLS sensor gain used 
between orbital data acquisitions. The unrecorded variation 
in gain settings causes differing degrees of image blooming 
for a given urban area which cannot be adequately rectified 
between data takes. This study employs DMSP/OLS data 
collected by the U.S. Air Force and NOAA/NGDC using 
gain control to limit sensor saturation over urban areas and 
provide light intensity image data of urban, suburban, and 
industrial areas, in the United States. The use of gain control 
allows for the classification of lit area based on measured 
light intensity values and opens the door to a whole new 
field of remotely mapping and classifying human settlements 
and assessing their impact on the biosphere. 
INTRODUCTION 
Recently, the phenomenon of urbanization is of growing 
interest to the science community. Human population 
growth and the trend toward urbanization has pushed urban 
land transformation issues into the arena of global climate 
change and economic and biological sustainability (Kates et 
al., 1990; Ehrlich and Wilson, 1991; Raven, 1991; Daily 
and Ehrlich, 1992; Ehrlich and Ehrlich, 1992). 
Historically, however, measuring the extent of urbanization 
using conventional methods has been problematic even in 
the U.S. where modern census procedures are used. 
DMSP/OLS Images of Earth's Inhabited Places 
Satellite remote sensing can be a useful alternative and 
corroborative technology for measuring and monitoring the 
location and extent of urbanization. Nighttime images of 
Earth's cities acquired from the Defense Meteorological 
Satellite Program's Operational Linescan System 
(DMSP/OLS) provide a dramatic picture of urbanization 
through the detection of city lights. Early work with this 
data demonstrated its potential as an urban mapping tool, 
(Croft 1978, Welch 1980, and later by Kramer 1994) and as a 
means for relating lighted area and human habitation to 
energy consumption (Welch and Zupko 1980, and later by 
Elvidge et al. 19972). The high contrast between lighted 
and unlighted lands, provided by the image data, and the 
sensor's moderate spatial resolution (2.7 km) make it an 
potent choice for identifying areas where significant human 
activity is being carried out. 
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's 
National Geoscience Data Center (NOAA/NGDC) has 
produced two types of DMSP/OLS data suitable for urban 
applications: 1) the "stable lights" or temporal image 
composites and 2) gain controlled data designed for urban 
imaging. Both types of data are available for the U.S. 
(Elvidge 1997b). 
The "stable lights" data set is a composite of many images 
collected over time. It effectively eliminates ephemeral light 
sources such as lightning and fires to provide an image of 
consistently lit areas on the Earth's surface. This product 
has been shown to be useful for mapping urban areas, 
predicting energy use, and for assessing the impact of land 
transformation on soil productivity (Imhoff et al. 1997a, 
1997b, Elvidge et al. 1997a, Sutton et al. 1997). The stable 
lights product is valuable because it eliminates ephemeral 
light sources and provides a means of identifying stable 
developed areas in the imagery. However, since the gain of 
the sensor was not controlled for urban applications, most 
urban light emissions saturated the sensor making 
relationships between image DN value and radiance level 
impossible. Also the saturation effect has a degrading effect 
on the 2.7km resolution of DMSP/OLS through blooming. 
The blooming created by fluctuating gain settings 
(especially at the high end) and the compositing process can 
create problems in finer scale applications of the data. 
The gain controlled DMSP/OLS data, on the other hand, is 
collected using gain settings that are adjusted so that only a 
very few large urban areas saturate the sensor while still 
being sensitive enough to detect the smaller towns and 
inhabited places. The gain controlled data allows for a more 
methodical analysis of the data and the ability to translate 
the image digital numbers (DN’s) to radiance values in 
watts (Watts/cm?/sr/pm). Density slicing the gain controlled 
data along the radiance axis has meaning relative to light 
emission intensity on the ground and controls blooming. 
The gain controlled data used in this analysis were collected 
in March, 1996. 
METHODS 
Thresholding the Gain Controlled Image Data 
Prior studies using the stable lights composite product 
(data collected from 1994 to 1995) showed that a spatial 
integrity determinant could be used to reduce blooming and 
create an image product which very accurately mapped urban 
area in the U.S. (Imhoff 1997a). Accuracy was assessed by 
comparing the lit area defined by the DMSP product to the 
area of urban and urbanized land defined by the 1990 U.S. 
Census. Results for the “stable lights” product showed an 
overall difference between lit area (after the threshold) and 
the census estimate of urban lands of only 5%. However, on 
a state by state comparison, there were large differences 
between the census and the stable lights data depending on 
the spatial patterns of development and the above mentioned 
limitations of the stable lights product. 
For the gain controlled DMSP/OLS data set of the U.S., we 
decided to make a similar assessment of the imagery by again 
comparing it to the 1990 census data of urban and urbanized 
Intemational Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 435 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.