Full text: Transactions of the Symposium on Photo Interpretation

WORKING GROUP 6 
LANDEN 
367 
about 200,000 square miles of photography to these figures. Fig. 1 shows the 
approximate areas of photographic coverage from all sources, both recon 
naissance and mapping, in 1962. 
Because of the large area of Antarctica, almost 6 million square miles, and 
the problems of logistical support, complete standard optical photographic 
coverage of Antarctica, even for 1 : 1 million-scale mapping, would be expen 
sive and is probably unnecessary. 
Mapworthy and featureless terrain can be essentially distinguished by 
interpretation of reconnaissance photography. Photo interpretation is used in 
a variety of problems in delineating landforms and identifying unusual ice 
features in topographic mapping. Finally, photo interpretation is used as the 
basis for symbolizing ice features by pictorial and shaded-relief treatment. 
The application of photo interpretation 
Defining the mapworthy areas 
A mapworthy feature may be defined as a prominent, conspicuous, or 
essential part of the landscape. It should have some permanent value to the 
map and its size and shape should be consistent with the scale of the map. One 
of the tests of a mapworthy feature is its ability to serve as a landmark at the 
scale of the particular map; if it could not be recovered or recognized at some 
future time either on the ground or from the air, its value to the map would be 
limited. The following features are generally considered by glaciologists to be 
mapworthy for 1 : 250,000 and smaller scale mapping: 
Crevasses, crevassing, dark ice, disturbed ice, escarpments, glacial moraine, 
glacial shear moraine, glaciers (valley and channel), ice cap, ice-free or ex 
posed areas, ice cliff, ice wall, icefall, ice ramp, ice shelf, ice sheet, ice tongue, 
ice peaks, lakes and meltwater streams, moraine (also glacial moraine), nun- 
ataks, rock outcrops, shoreline and indefinite shoreline. 
Features relating to the sea ice such as open leads in the offshore ice, pack 
ice, ice islands, floes and icebergs, are either too indefinite or appear only as 
seasonal features, and, in general, need not be shown. An exception may be 
made for bergs that result from a glacier’s calving; they are mapworthy fea 
tures [Charlesworth 1957]. 
The problem of distinguishing between mapworthy and featureless terrain 
may be made less difficult by introducing the concept of the marginal zone of 
the ice cap, the zone where surface disturbances are caused by bedrock relief 
forming rolling surfaces, crevasses, and nunataks. In contrast to the center of 
the ice sheet where the surface is generally flat and smooth, the marginal zone 
is marked by landforms, ice and snow disturbances, and meltwater features. 
Crevasses can be expected practically everywhere in the marginal zone. 
L. M. Gould [Gould 1949] divides the marginal features into three types: 
1. The vast undulating, terraced, and crevassed sheets moving into the sea as 
an unconstricted or unconfmed wall of ice; 2. the restricted or directed tongues 
of ice (valley glaciers and extensions); and 3. shelf ice.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.