Full text: New perspectives to save cultural heritage

L. Barba 
Laboratorio de Prospección Arqueológica 
Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM 
Ciudad Universitaria, México D.F. 04510 
KEY WORDS: Geophysics, Archaeology, Architectural Patrimony, Mexico City 
Five years ago, the Archaeological Research Laboratory established a pilot project to study the archaeological remains buried under 
the present surface of the Coyoacan and Churubusco neighborhoods in southern Mexico City. The structures that once were part of 
these important pre-Hispanic settlements were destroyed and their remains have been covered by sediments through the years. 
Nowadays, the differential sinking of the floor of the Basin of Mexico is producing a topographic relief just in the places where a 
previous compaction of the sediments has taken place. Our team has proved that the best approach to study archaeological remains 
under modem urban developments is the application of geophysical techniques. Top date, results from the study carried out at 
Coyoacan have demonstrated that magnetic gradient, electrostatic resistivity and earth penetrating radar are the best geophysical 
techniques to locate and study buried archaeological structures avoiding any damage to the surface. Some studies have reached the 
Churubusco neighborhood where some ceremonial and domestic structures were excavated. The same kinds of studies can be applied 
to the whole of Mexico City. The long-term goal is to produce an inventory of the location of buried archaeological remains underneath 
the city’s pavement to prevent any damage caused by the construction of modern private buildings or public urban structures. Besides 
this evident function, we have observed that many problems affecting the stability of the structures included in the inventory of the 
city’s heritage are closely related to the existence of archaeological remains underneath them. This is especially dangerous during the 
seismic events the city frequently experiences. The main contribution of this project is to provide information to locate, evaluate and 
preserve the buried archaeological remains and the patrimony that is part of the modern city. 
In some locations in Mexico City its surface appears rippled, 
irregularities that are not evident in photos and drawings from 
the turn of the century. This is associated to two origins: Location 
of pre-Columbian settlements and the recent sinking of the city. 
At the Anthropological Research Institute’s Archaeological 
Prospection Laboratory a project is under way to systematically 
study archaeological sites so to make an inventory to work in a 
city where the predictive aspects are hard to consider. The 
difference between geotechnical properties in pre-compacted soils 
in relation to their environs has been remarked recently with the 
intensification in the city’s rates of sinking. This differential 
affectation can be seen in the re-accommodation and fractures 
both on the surface as well as on the buildings. The speed with 
which water is being extracted from the city’s subsoil ensures 
that this process is unstoppable and the sinking will continue 
thereby worsening the phenomenon. In this sense, studies will 
enable us to locate most damaged areas and to explain the causes 
that produce them. 
In the present paper we resort to the geotechnical properties of 
pre-compacted soil in respect of their environs, which are causing 
differential sinking. The hypothesis under study is that if these 
differences represent changes produced by human settlements, 
then, archaeological sites covered by modern urban settlements 
can be recognized and studied from the surface, using geophysical 
To determine the approximate localization of sixteenth century 
human settlements, we studied ancient maps of what used to be 
the lake zone and its association with the present day city. 
Furthermore the toponyms were analyzed for they indicate the 
presence of ancient settlements. It’s surprising how many nahuatl 
toponyms are still extant and can be seen in modern maps, in the 
names of alleys, streets, neighborhoods and the like. 
Sixteenth century maps show a recently rebuilt Mexico City with 
some islets surrounding the center of the former Mexico- 
Tenochtitlan. In the Cortez Map, chinampas are vaguely depicted 
as concentric alignments surrounding the main settlement. The 
Uppsala Map doesn’t pay much attention neither to the islet nor 
to the chinampas, since it only identifies Iztacalco. Recently, the 
map drawn by González Aparicio (1973) and published in a 
modified fashion by thq Arqueología Mexicana magazine (1995), 
shows the location of several islets built on the western part of 
the Texcoco Lake. Sites of potential pre-Hispanic settlements 
appear to be concentrated in a space spanning the western 
lakeshore and the San Lázaro dyke, and between Tepeyac and 
Culhuacán as well. 
These maps show that the western part of the lake was the least 
deep. This might have been the consequence of the buildup of 
sediments coming from the Sierra de las Cruces range. Therefore, 
this zone was the most likely to be settled, since its shallowness

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.