710
BAND 4/BAND 6
BIOMASS INDEX
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
3 BAND COMPOSITE
PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS
Figure 1. Thematic partitions of the Taff River basin
RO = f (RF) A'.
c c
where the suffix c refers to the whole catchment.
We examined hydrological records for this area and
found that the runoff function was a simple linear
relationship, and hence the yield in millimetres over
the catchment,
Yield = — = a RF - b (mm)
c
Therefore, at the simplest level, our satellite
classifications will be useful if they can be used to
predict the values of proportional runoff, a , and
losses, b , for any catchment.
Our approach was to derive parameter values based
on the conventional image processing techniques of
density slicing and classification. Thus we could
slice a Near Infra Red image and estimate the total
area in the catchment in each of say 5 levels. The
same process could be applied to Biomass Index,
Principal Component or any band ratio. Alternatively
a classification could be made, and the areas falling
within various classifications measured. This applied
to supervised or unsupervised classifications and any
colour composites.
Thus we could derive a set of variables such as
LEVELAI, LEVELA2...LEVELA5, LEVELB1...LEVELB5,
CLASSAI, CLASSA2, CLASSA5, etc., where LEVELA
refers to a density slice in NIR, CLASSA refers to
an unsupervised classification etc. The values of
constants a and b could then be evaluated by multiple
regression.
Clearly a very large correlation analysis could
ensue, so some preparatory work was needed. Only
those parameters which exhibited a large variance
and showed a strong correlation with streamflow, and
showed little correlation with other parameters were
considered. Once this weeding was done, then a
multiple regression could be carried out.
3 METHOD
A suitable set of 'satellite' catchment character
istics was chosen. Parameter values were extracted
for the study catchments. Annual rainfall and runoff
values were acquired, and for each catchment the
constants a and b were calculated for the equation
RO = a RF - b
The constants a and b were regressed in turn on the
set of catchment characteristics, and the optimal
regression equations were found. The equations were
tested by estimating values of annual runoff not
previously used.
4 DISCUSSION AND RESULTS
The first impression was that the various slices and
classifications enabled many different partitionings
of the catc
when the pr
calculated,
classificat
as soon as
became simi
ent.
Secondly,
ations occu:
negative co:
proportion (
tion of LEVI
correlation!
FOREST corn
The const,
reduced set
correlation!
result, it :
and points 1
The under!
the satelli-
of the regrt
e.g. CLASSA
eneous. The
evaluate th<
case the ch;
ion of sense
catchment. 1
should lie \
Landsat MSS,
SPOT. This i
there is in«
and environi
Thus, the de
variance to
To achieve
include in t
more dissimi
similarity v
remote from
preting more
will inevitc
and differer
that we shoe
ics, and use
consistent i
and time to
argument is
to: either
regression n
Apart from
clearly lost
catchment ch
the two main
we have lost
Although t
unsuccessful
for average
annual flood
summary stat
sions were f
place of con
and supports
ful if the r
5 CONCLUSIO
The hydrolog
seen to depe
characterist
an hydrologi
teristics as
because the
istics from
was too smal
would have t
problems of
different im
insuperable.