741
2). Potential
:ain
restrictions,
KEY
area. Based
>f mapping,
> percent for
’ala et al
ACTIVITY
;o be conducted
Inventory
of
nment studies
Hydroelectric
3 to better
Potential
in this pilot
(River Basin Plan)
1
3NT STUDIES
set, the
sensing has or
rt or
River System
Feasibility
Studies
<
idies for
Economic,
Engineering and
Environmental
Studies
sd-based
Lcularly in
obtaining
for the area in
it of baseline
tion in Ontario
trimarily on
{ regulatory
ormat of
among
notion of
land use
ints within a
1 data bases do
Reviews,
Hearings,
Approvals
Design and
Construction
(Pre-Operation
Monitoring)
Compliance
Monitoring
PROJECT
PHASE
INVENTORY
CONCEPT
DEFINITION
ACQUISITION
OPERATION
REMOTE SENSING
APPLICATIONS
River Basin
Mapping
Retrospective Studies
I
Development Scenarios
(Flooding Elevations)
Scoping
I
Baseline Inventory
!
Impact
Assessment
(Predictions)
Follow-up &
Verification
Long Term
Monitoring &
Surveillance
a parameters in
ly dated, Figure 2 - Remote sensing applications in the planning and development
puree Inventory process for hydroelectric generation in Ontario
the LJR is
1 studies. The
alized
tative cover
urns, and
ful in
the "context"
ce. Tests
gest that these
ally extended
th regard to
iver basin
scale was
t for mapping
propriateness
asin size,
ents an
1 and cost
ty"
er fragmented
nd use mapping
e-consuming
terpretation.
n from remote
becomes a
d to assess and
can be readily
input
rk boundaries)
ontext to the
ng based system
maries for the
ventional data
collection techniques often tend to be "one-shot"
efforts that remain static in time, and require
extensive effort and expense to update. Recent
successes in merging geographic information systems
(GIS) and remote sensing based digital image analysis
(DIA) systems are likely to vastly improve the
utility of remotely sensed data for broad level
planning applications in the future.
Based on the success achieved in the LJR mapping
exercise, a second project has been undertaken with
OCRS to provide land cover mapping for the Moose
River basin (100,000 km 2 ) in northeastern Ontario.
Mapping here will be used to improve broad level
river basin planning, and as input to detailed
hydroelectric project studies currently underway in a
portion of the basin.
3.2 Conceptual assessments
Conceptual assessments are usually low budget,
iterative planning exercises to determine if there
are any major obstacles constraining future
hydroelectric development in a given river basin.
These studies typically look at a number of
alternative concepts, and recommend preferred
projects for more detailed engineering and
environmental studies (in a Definition Phase).
Environmental studies at this stage are largely
qualitative in nature, and rely heavily on existing,
readily accessible data, with a minimal provision for
field reconnaissance. Broad categorization of cover
type and land use is usually adequate for conceptual
assessment purposes. LANDSAT imagery provides a
convenient and readily updatable source of this type
of information, which is well-suited to the
conceptual level of detail. In remote northern areas
particularly, it may be the only source of
comprehensive data for an entire study area. LANDSAT
imagery provides essentially a uniform data base for
a river basin which is usually, or can be made to be,
temporally consistent.
An important part of conceptual level assessments
is a requirement to evaluate a large number of
alternative development schemes. An analysis of
alternative dam sites, as well as variations in
flooding elevations at these sites, is particularly
critical. While topographical contour information
cannot be directly interpreted from LANDSAT imagery,
the ability of the OCRS system to utilize digitized
information makes it possible to manually input a
series of flooding elevations, and derive statistical
summaries of displaced vegetation and other resource
uses for a large number of alternatives within a
basin. Digitization can also be used to overlap,
certain other spatial information (e.g., provincial
park boundaries, sensitive areas) on a classified
image to improve the data base available for
feasibility assessment. It should be noted that
manual digitization is time-consuming. Tests
conducted during the pilot study suggest that time
commitments may be a real controlling factor in
determining the optimum number of alternatives that
can be realistically examined at the conceptual
phase. Evolving techniques that permit video camera
input of topographic data (to a combined GIS and DIA
system) should significantly simplify this process,
and provide increased analytical capabilities at a
relatively low cost.
In addition to potential environmental
applications, generalized land cover mapping may have
some value for preliminary techno-engineering studies
at the conceptual level. For example, the
availability of construction (e.g., aggregate)
materials is a key consideration in judging the
viability of future development. Maps produced for
the LJR provide information on the location of active
gravel pits within the basin, and suggest that the
availability of readily accessible construction
materials is somewhat limited. Some measure of
aggregate potential may also be possible using remote
sensing imagery (Ross and Singhroy 1983).
Another technical aspect that can be addressed is
reservoir clearing. Vegetative and other resource
use loss data for various reservoir areas in the
basin can be used to broadly estimate clearing costs,
major conflicting uses and potential compensation
costs for single headponds or a series of
reservoirs. The type and quality (e.g., merchantible
vs non-merchantible) of forest vegetation in a
reservoir can also be generally assessed; and this
might influence clearing strategies for one reservoir
vs another. While further detailed studies will be
required to confirm a preferred reservoir clearing
strategy, information provided by LANDSAT imagery
appears quite suitable for determining the
preliminary feasibility of alternative approaches.
3.3 Project scoping
An important part of early project planning for
detailed EA studies (in the Definition Phase) is the
definition of study area boundaries and the
identification of critical or publicly sensitive
environmental and other parameters within the study
area. EA practitioners and regulators refer to this
early planning phase as scoping. Scoping is viewed
as a cost-effective method of focussing baseline