APPLICATION OF THE WEIGHTED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX
TO SATELLITE DATA
Dr. J.G.P.W. Clevers, Remote Sensing Researcher in Agriculture,
Dept, of Landsurveying and Remote Sensing, Wageningen Agricultural
University, P.O. Box 339, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
ABSTRACT
The application of the weighted (near-infrared - red) difference vegetation index (WDVI) to satellite data
is evaluated. It was described earlier (Clevers 1988a, 1989) that the WDVI, based on reflectance factors,
can be used for estimating green leaf area index (LM). This WDVI offered a good correction for soil
background (soil moisture) in estimating the LAI of e.g. cereals.
With satellites, digital numbers instead of reflectance factors are obtained. A procedure for applying
the WDVI to satellite data is described: (1) offset correction, (2) calculating the slope of the soil line
and (3) calculating the WDVI for satellite data (WDVI sat ). The WDVI sat is a two-dimensional analogue of
the Kauth-Thomas Greenness. The results of an analysis of a TM scene of the Flevoland agricultural
area in the Netherlands, recorded 22 August 1984, shows little difference between images of the WDVI
(based on TM bands 3 and 4) and the Kauth-Thomas Greenness. A training set yielded a linear correlation
coefficient of 0.997 between WDVI and Greenness. Application of the WDVI concept induces a considerable
simplification of data analysis.
Atmosheric correction is indispensable for a multitemporal analysis of optical satellite data. The above
procedure is extended in order to derive the WDVI in a multitemporal analysis based on surface information
only (e.g. water, bare soil and urban areas).
KEY WORDS: Weighted Difference Vegetation Index, Satellite data, Greenness.
1. INTRODUCTION
Application of remote sensing techniques has
the potential to provide information about
agricultural crops quantitatively,
instantaneously and, above all, non-
destructively. During the past decades
knowledge about remote sensing techniques and
their application to fields such as
agriculture has improved considerably. Bunnik
(1978) demonstrated the possibilities of
applying remote sensing in agriculture,
particularly with regard to crop charac
teristics such as soil cover and leaf area
index (LAI). LAI is defined as the total
one-sided green leaf area per unit soil area
and it is regarded as a very important plant
characteristic because photosynthesis takes
place in the green plant parts. The LAI is
also a main driving variable in many crop
growth models, designed for yield prediction
(Penning de Vries & Laar, 1982). Crop growth
models describe the relation between physio
logical processes in plants and environmental
factors such as solar radiation, temperature
and water and nutrient availability.
Estimates of crop growth often are inaccurate
for sub-optimal growing conditions. Remote
sensing may yield information about the
actual status of a crop (e.g., in terms of
LAI), resulting in an improvement of crop
growth modelling.
At the beginning of the growing season,
soil reflectance influences the relation
between measured infrared reflectance and
LAI. At low soil cover, soil reflectance
contributes strongly to the composite
canopy-soil reflectance in the different
spectral bands. Soil moisture content is not
constant during the growing season and
differences in soil moisture content greatly
influence soil reflectance.
At the end of the growing season, annual
agricultural plants will show signs of
senescence. Leaves turn from green to yellow.
This phenomenon starts when the LAI is at its
maximum value. In cereals all the leaves have
appeared by that moment and the ears are
about to appear. Subsequently, both LAI and
photosynthetic activity decrease, because
only the green parts will be photosynthe-
tically active. During this stage it is
important to gain an impression of the speed
of senescence and to estimate LAI. Yellow
leaves will also influence the relation
between measured infrared reflectance and
(green) LAI.
If a multitemporal analysis of remote
sensing data is required, a correction has to
be made for background when ascertaining the
relation between infrared reflectance factors
and LAI. First of all, attention will be
focussed on correction for soil background
(Clevers 1988a, 1989). Clevers (1990) has