Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management (Volume 1)

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management (Volume 1)

Multivolume work

Persistent identifier:
856342815
Title:
Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management
Sub title:
proceedings of the 7th international Symposium, Enschede, 25 - 29 August 1986
Year of publication:
1986
Place of publication:
Rotterdam
Boston
Publisher of the original:
A. A. Balkema
Identifier (digital):
856342815
Language:
English
Additional Notes:
Volume 1-3 erschienen von 1986-1988
Editor:
Damen, M. C. J.
Document type:
Multivolume work

Volume

Persistent identifier:
856343064
Title:
Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management
Sub title:
proceedings of the 7th international Symposium, Enschede, 25 - 29 August 1986
Scope:
XV, 547 Seiten
Year of publication:
1986
Place of publication:
Rotterdam
Boston
Publisher of the original:
A. A. Balkema
Identifier (digital):
856343064
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme
Signature of the source:
ZS 312(26,7,1)
Language:
English
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Editor:
Damen, M. C. J.
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2016
Document type:
Volume
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
3 Spectral signatures of objects. Chairman: G. Guyot, Liaison: N. J. J. Bunnik
Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
The use of Thematic Mapper imagery for geomorphological mapping in arid and semi-arid environments. A. R. Jones
Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management
  • Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management (Volume 1)
  • Cover
  • Title page
  • Title page
  • Title page
  • Preface
  • Organization of the Symposium
  • Working Groups
  • Table of contents
  • 1 Visible and infrared data. Chairman: F. Quiel, Liaison: N J. Mulder
  • 2 Microwave data. Chairman: N. Lannelongue, Liaison: L. Krul
  • 3 Spectral signatures of objects. Chairman: G. Guyot, Liaison: N. J. J. Bunnik
  • Relationship between soil and leaf metal content and Landsat MSS and TM acquired canopy reflectance data. C. Banninger
  • The conception of a project investigating the spectral reflectivity of plant targets using high spectral resolution and manifold repetitions. F. Boochs
  • CAESAR: CCD Airborne Experimental Scanner for Applications in Remote Sensing. N. J. J. Bunnik & H. Pouwels, C. Smorenburg & A. L. G. van Valkenburg
  • LANDSAT TM band combinations for crop discrimination. Sherry Chou Chen, Getulio Teixeira Batista & Antonio Tebaldi Tardin
  • The derivation of a simplified reflectance model for the estimation of LAI. J. G. P. W. Clevers
  • The application of a vegetation index in correcting the infrared reflectance for soil background. J. G. P. W. Clevers
  • The use of multispectral photography in agricultural research. J. G. P. W. Clevers
  • TURTLE and HARE, two detailed crop reflection models. J. A. den Dulk
  • Sugar beet biomass estimation using spectral data derived from colour infrared slides. Robert R. De Wulf & Roland E. Goossens
  • Multitemporal analysis of Thematic Mapper data for soil survey in Southern Tunisia. G. F. Epema
  • Insertion of hydrological decorralated data from photographic sensors of the Shuttle in a digital cartography of geophysical explorations (Spacelab 1-Metric Camera and Large Format Camera). G. Galibert
  • Spectral signature of rice fields using Landsat-5 TM in the Mediterranean coast of Spain. S. Gandia, V. Caselles, A. Gilabert & J. Meliá
  • The canopy hot-spot as crop identifier. S. A. W. Gerstl, C. Simmer & B. J. Powers
  • An evaluation of different green vegetation indices for wheat yield forecasting. A. Giovacchini
  • Spectral and botanical classification of grasslands: Auxois example. C. M. Girard
  • The use of Thematic Mapper imagery for geomorphological mapping in arid and semi-arid environments. A. R. Jones
  • Determination of spectral signatures of different forest damages from varying altitudes of multispectral scanner data. A. Kadro
  • A preliminary assessment of an airborne thermal video frame scanning system for environmental engineering surveys. T. J. M. Kennie & C. D. Dale, G. C. Stove
  • Study on the spectral radiometric characteristics and the spectrum yield model of spring wheat in the field of BeiAn city, HeilonJiang province, China (primary report). Ma-Yanyou, You-Bochung, Guo-Ruikuan, Lin-Weigang & Mo-Hong
  • Multitemporal analysis of LANDSAT Multispectral Scanner (MSS) and Thematic Mapper (TM) data to map crops in the Po valley (Italy) and in Mendoza (Argentina). M. Menenti & S. Azzali, D. A. Collado & S. Leguizamon
  • Selection of bands for a newly developed Multispectral Airborne Reference-aided Calibrated Scanner (MARCS). M. A. Mulders, A. N. de Jong, K. Schurer, D. de Hoop
  • Mapping of available solar radiation at ground. Ehrhard Raschke & Martin Rieland
  • Spectral signatures of soils and terrain conditions using lasers and spectrometers. H. Schreier
  • Relation between spectral reflectance and vegetation index. S. M. Singh
  • On the estimation of the condition of agricultural objects from spectral signatures in the VIS, NIR, MIR and TIR wavebands. R. Söllner, K.-H. Marek & H. Weichelt, H. Barsch
  • LANDSAT temporal-spectral profiles of crops on the South African Highveld. B. Turner
  • Theoretic reflection modelling of soil surface properties. B. P. J. van den Bergh & B. A. M. Bouman
  • Monitoring of renewable resources in equatorial countries. R. van Konijnenburg, Mahsum Irsyam
  • Assessment of soil properties from spectral data. G. Venkatachalam & V. K. R. Jeyasingh
  • Spectral components analysis: Rationale and results. C. L. Wiegand & A. J. Richardson
  • 4 Renewable resources in rural areas: Vegetation, forestry, agriculture, soil survey, land and water use. Chairman: J. Besenicar, Liaisons: M. Molenaar, Th. A. de Boer
  • Cover

Full text

279 
lability of multiband remotely sensed data, and can 
lead to extraction of information not apparent on the 
original imagery. One such technique is principal 
component analysis (PCA), especially useful if the 
bands are highly correlated. New images are produced 
by calculating new, uncorrelated principal components 
using a series of linear weights, called eigenvectors, 
which are applied to the origional band values. 
These principal components represent more efficient 
ly the variance of the data. 
A study of the eigenvalues for the El Guettar scene 
indicates that the data are just about three dimensi 
onal in structure with 99 per cent of the variance 
being explained by the first three components (Table 
4). A study of the eigenector weights attached to 
six principal component images, derived for the study 
area, using the six reflective TM bands. PCI is an 
overall summary of the albedo while PC2 is the diff 
erence between the visible/near IR and the mid-IR. 
This explains the brightness of the image, the extra 
ction of the areas of fan deposition, variation with 
in the playa and structure in the mountains. PC3 
(Fig. 8a) has a high band 4 weight which produces an 
image similar to the 3/4 ratio displaying vegetation 
while PC4 (Fig. 8b) is the difference between the two 
mid-IR bands and picks out the structure in the solid 
geology, fans and variation in the playa very clearly. 
Too much noise in the remaining components prevent 
any useful analysis. 
Many remote sensing studies have used supervised 
classification whereby the image is classified by the 
user who defines training areas where the surface 
properties are known. This allows the computer to 
classify the image on the basis of the information 
held in the training areas. This works very well in 
vegetation studies (Townshend 1981) but in geomorph 
ology it is very'- difficult to obtain unique spectral 
responses for landforms. Therefore, supervised class 
ification is not very suitable and the potential of 
unsupervised classification has been tested. This 
applies a clustering algorithm to the data and requi 
res no previous knowledge of the area. In the algor 
ithm used, the data was clustered according to a max 
imum likelihood classification, and the only user in 
volvement was to stipulate the starting number of 
classes, the maximum and minimum percentage of the 
image contained in any one class and the number of 
iterations for clustering. The resulting image was 
colour-coded, density sliced, and class statistics 
were derived allowing the display of individual class 
es and the proportion of the image contained in each 
class. 
Figure 9. Example of one cluster derived from an un 
supervised classification of El Guettar using TM bands 
3,4 and 5. This class relates to areas of solid 
geology. 
The test area was subjected to an unsupervised class 
ification on a three band image (3, 4 and 5) which 
produced 10 classes and 99 per cent of the image 
classified. The results are very engouraging. Some 
of the features which have been classified are areas 
of solid geology, variation within the fans, playa, 
alluvial plain, agriculture and the large ephemeral 
channel but a number of meaningless classes were also 
produced. The level of separation is visible in fig 
ure 9 which shows how one class corresponds to areas 
of solid lithology and oasis vegetation. Only rarely 
did a unique class occur, usually a number of featu 
res could be identified in the same cluster. This is 
due to similarity of pixel values of different units 
which leads to confusion within the feature space. 
However, the technique shows great potential for geo- 
morphological mapping especially if the user wishes 
to extract the main geomorphic units in a new area of 
interest. 
Further information reqarding the imaae nrocessina 
techniques discussed here can be found in Moik (1980) 
Schowengerdt (1983) and Gillespie (1980). 
6 CONCLUSIONS 
It has been shown that although single band Thematic 
Mapper imagery and standard false-colour composites 
show excellent geomorphological detail, it is worth 
noting that when dealing with bare, unvegetated sur 
faces, typical of arid/semi-arid areas, the degree of 
correlation between the bands is so high that most of 
the bands are redundant. Much more information can be 
extracted using digital image processing. Effective 
techniques range from simple contrast stretching to 
more complex multivariate techniques such as unsuper 
vised classification and principal component analysis. 
However, no single image processing technique is suit 
able for all landforms. Best results are obtained 
when there exists a specific relationship between 
spectral response and the physical properties of the 
phenomena under investigation. This relationship can 
then be exploited by selecting the optimum image pro 
cessing technique. 
The resulting processed imagery are an invaluable 
asset to anyone contemplating geomorphological mapp 
ing especially in difficult terrain. Digitally enhan 
ced satellite Thematic Mapper imagery is a powerful 
tool for geomorphologists for studying processes and 
for mapping. Not only does it afford a new perspect 
ive from which to observe the Earth's surface but it 
allows the development of new ideas regarding geomorph 
ological processes, the origins and modifications of 
landforms. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
I wish to thank Dr. J.R.G. Townshend for his construe 
tive comments during the preparation of this paper and 
to the cartographic and photographic units of the 
Geography Department, University of Reading. Arwyn 
Jones is a NERC postgraduate research student GT4/ 
83/GS/87. 
REFERENCES 
Bailey, G.,J.Dwyer & Francica 1982. Evaluation of ima 
ge processing of Landsat data for geologic interpre 
tation of the Qaidam Basin, China. Second Thematic 
Conf., Remote Sensing for Exploration Geology, Fort 
Worth, Texas, p.555-577. 
Brunsden, D.,J.Doornkamp & D.Jones 1979. The Bahrain 
Surface Materials Resources Survey and its applicat 
ion to planning. Geogr. Jour. 145:1-35. 
Colwell, R. 1983. Manual of Remote Sensing, Vol I & II 
American Soc. of Photogram., Falls Church, USA. 2nd 
Edition. 
Doehring, D. 1980. Geomorphology in arid regions. All 
en & Unwin, London, p. 272.
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Damen, M. .C. .J. Remote Sensing for Resources Development and Environmental Management. A. A. Balkema, 1986.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many letters is "Goobi"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.