20
the time for resolution sessions (about 7h) not included. In the meetings held
simultaneously we tried to avoid inclusion in both meetings of subjects of
a similar nature, or of papers of great general interest. Work on the preparation
of the programme was carried on in close cooperation with the commission
boards, which sometimes had other points af view, such as for instance logical
succession of papers in a commission meeting. Besides this, certain alterations
to the programme had to be made during the Congress, as a rule at the request
of the commission boards. Since we lecturers easily underestimate the time
requirement — especially when there is simultaneous or consecutive interpre
tation — there often occurred, in spite of the special alarm system, considerable
exceeding of the times allotted, to the detriment of the discussion periods. This
should be stated for the benefit of those who, quite naturally, expressed dissatis
faction because some interesting discussions could not be concluded. On the
whole, however, the programme appears to have fulfilled its purpose even if,
for the reasons given above, it was relatively compact. Precisely for that reason
certain recreative items were included, in the form of excursions, film per
formances, and so on. Moreover, altogether 10 hours of ordinary programme time
were left completely free for visits to the very interesting exhibition. It was
impossible to allow more free time for this important purpose, but we assumed
that many of the 339 programme items were of such a specialised nature that
only small groups would participate in them. This proved to be the case. Without
completely new principles for the congresses more programme time can hardly
be allotted for the exhibition: we must rely on every participant deciding him
self on the use of his time.
The immense amount of material announced for the VIII Congress made
the Council and the Delegate Meeting clearly see that the new Administration
should try to achieve a certain filtering of the material and concentration of
the programme on a few central questions and problems. The new Council
with its executive group located in Great Britain also received the necessary
authority for this by decision of the General Assembly.
The abundance of the Congress programme is also reflected by the extensive
ness of the publications and by this volume of the Archives which confirms
the results of the Congress.
At earlier congresses the participants have first on arrival at the place of
the congress obtained a possibility of deciding from the titles on the programme
which items are of particular interest to them. It was therefore decided at an
early stage to print and distribute summaries of the papers, and this was done
in the case of 177 papers. Stencilled summaries were distributed at the opening
of the Congress for some additional papers. It was moreover requested that
authors should submit any off-prints available in time for distribution before
the Congress. This was unfortunately only observed in isolated cases and a large
number of off-prints or publications containing several articles (e.g. Photo-
grammetria) only arrived during the Congress or afterwards. On the other hand
all the General Reports of the Commissions and the majority of the National
Reports arrived in time to be bound for Part 2 and Part 3 of the Archives and
to be available on the opening of the Congress.
In an analysis of the »Archive problem» carried out at an early stage in order
to find means of quicker publication, greater homogeneity and clearer presen
tation, the following points of view were brought forward:
1. Inclusion of off-prints of various types and lengths in reports of meetings
is detrimental to clear presentation and complicates binding.
2. Better balance is obtained if only short, clear summaries are included
directly in the reports of meetings. Incorporation of all this material in one
volume would enable rational printing and binding to be achieved.