n and Row Crops,
awrence by Radar,
rology and
nment, Proc.,
h Louisiana Salt
bility from the
al Environments,
onment, Manila,
from Darien
olution Radar
ch. Rept. 177-7,
e, Kansas.
ssance of Panama,
- 1547 =
RADAR LAND USE MAPPING CAPABILITY
AS A FUNCTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODULATION
Floyd M. Henderson
Department of Geography
State University of New York at Albany
Albany, New York 12222
Introduction
Land use and land cover inventories are assuming increasingly
prominent roles in geographic information systems, planning programs,
and natural resource/environmental management and conservation efforts.
Concomitantly, the necessity of creating a reliable data base from
which existing land use records can be updated and changes monitored
is an accepted fact. Among the tools and techniques being developed to
supply such data remote sensing systems have received much attention.
Black and white, color, and color infrared photography have repeatedly
demonstrated their value. More recently, reports have demonstrated the
utility of Landsat imagery in analog as well as digital format for
studying myriad environmental phenomena. Another sensing system
deserving attention, particularly with the launch of Seasat-A and future
satellites, is radar imagery.
The advantages of radar imagery as they relate to land use mapping
are generally well-known to the remote sensing community, i.e., scale,
weather independence, day or night imaging capacity, and generation of
a synoptic view. Extensive, often unaccessible areas can be imaged
quickly on a small quantity of film. Many environmental signatures not
"visible" in other portions of the electromagnetic spectrum are manifest
on radar imagery and subject to examination. Of undeniable value as a
single sensor, radar derived information is also integral to the develop-
ment of multi-sensor packages.
Previous reports investigating the land use mapping potential and
limitations of radar imagery have addressed the detectability of various
landscape components and levels of detail. For example, Nunnally (1969)
created integrated landscapes similar to photomorphic regions using a
small area in North Carolina. Henderson (1975) attempted to define
thematic land use regions over an extensive traverse of the central and
western United States. Subsequent research proved that interpreters
could not consistently derive comparable regions using only a qualita-
tive interpretation key (Henderson, 1977). Bryan (1974), Lewis, et. al.
(1969), and Sabol (1969) among others have examined the visibility of
cultural features, particularly urban land use components. Aside from
the work of Henderson such investigations have focussed primarily on
specific detailed land use features (e.g., bridges, trailer courts) or
areally small study sites. However, to properly assess the overall
capability of any sensor a number of environments should be examined
to discern what level of detail can be consistently identified.