Full text: Proceedings of the international symposium on remote sensing for observation and inventory of earth resources and the endangered environment (Volume 3)

   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
    
   
   
   
    
   
    
     
    
    
    
  
3.4, Digital Computer Aided Classification 
The computer aided classification has been done with the DIBIAS 
of the DFVLR in Oberpfaffenhofen. The authors gratefully acknow- 
ledge the cooperation with the DFVLR and especially with 
Dr,.Kritikos. 
Only single date data (band 4, 5, 7) were used. 
  
3.4.1. Supervised Maximum Likelihood Classification 
The test area was located in the Rhine Vallev and its foothills. 
Definite training areas were selected for three main forest types. 
The classified units are shown in table 5, odumn ^ «AD 
attempt to classify more,and more detailed forest types was 
without significant success. 
  
The accuracy of the obtained results were tested by two different 
methods. The first used planimetering of the ground truth maps 
and then compared the results with those of the maximum likeli- 
hood classification obtained from the line printer sheet. The 
results of the acreage determination and comparisons are shown 
in table 5. 
Considering the ground truth as the starting point for estimat- 
ing the computer's mapping accuracy and assuming that each class 
unit corresponds to an accuracy of 100$, the corresponding class 
obtained via computer will have an accuracy of X. From this con- 
cept, 13.760,00 ha, of the forest land in the base-mao corres- 
pond to 100%. Since 15.272,00 ha. were obtained by the automatic 
process, there exists a commission error - that is, more forest 
resources were interpreted than the existing ones. The mathema- 
tical relation is an inverse one, which enables us to obtain an 
overall accuracy performance of 89,00$. Considering the same 
mathematical relation for the different classes, an accuracy 
was obtained for mixed coniferous of 93,40$, for mixed-deciduous 
of 83,209 and for P.silvestris of 86,502. The average class per- 
formance was 87,179 (about 1,30$ smaller than the overall accu- 
racy). 
Table 5 Comparison of acreage determination between ground 
truth and computer classification 
  
  
Forest Ground Truth Computer Error 
Type Classification 
ha. $ 3 Pixel ha, % $ $ 
Mixed 
Conifers (mount.) 6215 45,2 13,5 14620 6624 43,4 14,4 +6,6 
Mixed 
Deciduous 7013 51,0 15,2 18072 8188 53,6 17,8 +16,8 
EE 532... 3,9," 1,2 1015... 460 3,0 1,0 -1$,5 i 
Forest Land total 3760 100,0 29,9 33707 15272 00,0 33,2 +11,0 
Unclassified area 32240 70,1 67821 30728 66,8 — 4,7 
  
Test area total . 46000 100,0 101528 46000 100,0 
  
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.