os
2 IN 7 D) > A
) No“ RK
KO SC
D) GT
20m Ye NO
Pigure 6(ii)
Figure 6 —- Comparative interpretation results mapped at a common scale of
1:50,000 - (6a) 1958 panchromatic black-and-white aerial photography
at 1:40,000; (6b) 1974 Landsat data processed by computer analysis
and (6c) 1915/16 high altitude aerial photography at 1:70,000,
Note the lack of detailed information in the Landsat computer
analysis in 6(ii).
Legend 1: (Lophira test area) Legend 2: (Tama Forest Reserve
Wet cultivation vin, Test Area)
wet grassland =) High dense forest (///
and wet low bush/sedge C. ) High open forest (
D Re
VA i N >>
Figure T:
Sample ar
T
Close