004
ation
den,
Map
from
erent
ject
imed
new
ADE.
se of
rmed
from
"tion,
earch and
Js on the
'esearchers
2001; Lee,
(2002) and
ization
1999),
, 1995)
ization
alidate
h will
ization
1ses on
tors as
31S 8,3
ftware
2 from
ar scale
upports
ic map
vides a
ization,
a is to
les and
oducts.
support
objects
Ficult to
scales
; model
er scale
x. Land
ia, and
Iti-scale
develop
ts from
GA's
j au à
sis for
vels of
ht both
er scale
;. These
pes and
how t0
) merge,
efficient
ed ( Lee,
a set ol
fication.
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004 .
aggregation, displacement and so on. These tools will be
available as Component Object Model (COM) Objects for
Users to access, but they are also making them available as
batch functions within GeoProcessing modules, and will
implement them as interactive editing tools. The
GeoProcessing module will have a ModelBuilder, which
allows the user to chain a number of steps together and
process them in a logical sequence. This will help users to
model and fine-tune the generalization process. It should be
noted that all the above developments and improvements
will not be possible without a close co-operation between
universities, map producers, GIS software vendors and
NMAs.
7.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Dr Dan Lee of ESRI Redlands, USA, and
Professor Graeme Wright of Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin
University of Technology, Australia, for valuable comments on the
topic of generalizations.
8.0 REFERENCES
Arnold, L., and G. Wright, 2003. Analysing product-specific
behaviou to support process dependent updates in a dynamic spatial
updating model. Proceedings of the Spatial Sciences Conference
2003, September, Canberra, Australia, pp. 1-10.
Baelia, B., M. Pla, and D. Lee, 1995. Digital map generalization in
practice. Proceedings of ICA Workshop on Progress in Automated
Map Generalization, Barcelona, pp. 1-5.
Barrault, M., 1995, An automated system for linear feature name
placement which complies with cartographic quality criteria.
Autocarto 12 in Charlotte, NC, ACSM/ASPRS, pp. 321-330.
Badler M., and M. Barrault 2000. Improving snakes for linear feature
displacement in cartographic generalization. Geocomputation 2000,
pp. 1-14.
Brassel, K., and Weibel, R., 1998. A review and conceptual
framework of automated map generalization. International Journal of
Geographic Information Systems, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 229-224.
Brooks, R., 2001. A seat of the pants displacement operator.
Computational Cartography and Spatial Modelling. Natural
Resources Canada and Carlton University, Ottawa, Ontario, May
2001, Canada, pp. 1-30.
Brooks, R., 2000. Two birds with one stone: Constructing national
framework data for the global map. Proceedings of Global Mapping
Forum 2000, Hiroshima, Japan, November 2000, pp. I-11.
Costello, S., Broers R., and Swift, A., 2001. Helping the global
community to resolve global problems through spatial information:
AUSLIG's contribution to the Global Map project. Proceedings of
the AURISA 2001 - the 29th Annual Conference of AURISA, Grand
Hyatt, Melbourne, VIC, 19-23 November 2001, pp. 1-11.
Cecconi A., R. Weibel and M. Barrault 2000. Improving automated
generalization for on demand web mapping by multi-scale databases.
Proceedings of joint international symposium on geospatial theory,
processing and application, ISPRS, Ottawa, Canada, 2002, pp. 1-9.
Davis, A. C., and A. H. F. Laender. 1999. Multiple representations in
GIS: Materialization through map generalization, geometric and
spatial data analysis operations. ACM GIS, Kansas City, MO, USA,
pp. 60-65.
Duda, R. and Hart, P., 1973. Pattern classification and scene analysis.
New York. Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Douglas, d. H. and Peucker, T. K., 1973. Algorithms for the
reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized
line or its caricature. Canadian Cartographer, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 112-
195.
Forghani, A., Reddy R. and Smith G., 2003. Evaluating SPOT-5
satellite imagery for national mapping division’s topographie
Mapping programs. Proceedings of the Spatial Sciences Conference
2003, September, Canberra, Australia, pp. 1-12.
Forghani, A., 2000. Semi-automatic detection and enhancement of
linear features to update GIS files. Proceedings of the XIXth ISPRS
Congress, July 2000, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 1-8.
Gross, J and Yellen, J 1999. Graph theory and its application. CRC
-press, London.
1225
Holland, P., O'Donnell, I. and Nairn A., 2003. The database
revolution. Position Magazine, April 2003, edited by J. Fairall, pp.
40-42.
Haire, L., 2001. An optimization approach to cartography
generalization. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Surveying, Lund
Institute of Technology, Lund University, Sweden.
Iwanak, A, and Paluszynski, W., 2001. Generalization of topographic
maps of urban areas. Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry,
Wroclaw Academy of Agriculture, Wroclaw, Poland.
Jiang B. and Claramunt C., 2002. A structural approach to model
generalisation of an urban street network, Proceedings of the
4thAGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, 24-27
April, Mallorca, Spain, pp.205-217.
Joao, E. M., 1998. The algorithmic approach in Causes and
Consequences of Map Generalization, Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 10-
13;
Kazemi, F., 2003. A generalization framework to derive multi-scale
GEODATA. Proceedings of the Spatial Sciences Conference 2003,
September, Canberra, Australia, pp. 1-12.
Kilpelainen, T., 1997. Multiple representation and generalization of
geo-databases for topographic maps. Doctorate thesis, publications of
the finish geodetic Institute. No124.
Kreveld, M. C. 2001. Smooth generalization for continuous
zooming. Proceedings of 20th international cartographic conferences,
Beijing, China.
Kreveld, M. V., and Peschier, J, 1998. On the Automated
Generalization of Road Network Maps.
WWW diveom.otago.ac.nz/SIRC/GeoComp/GeoComp98/2 l/ge 21.ht
m.
Lee, D., 2002 and 2003. Personal communication. ESRI, Redlands,
USA. .
Lee, D., 1993. Knowledge acquisitation of digital cartographic
generalization. Proceedings of EGIS, pp. 1-12.
Lee, D., 2003. Generalization within a geoprocessing framework.
Proceedings of the GEOPRO 2003 Workshop, Mexico City,
November 2003, pp. 1-10.
Limeng, L., Lixin, W., 2001. Map generalization from scale of 1:500
000 to 1:2 500 000. Proceedings of the 20th International
Cartography Conference, August 6-10, Beijing, China.
Lemarie, C., (2004). Generalisation process for Top100: research in
generalisation brought to fruition. www.LaserScan.com.
Lonergan, M., and Jones, B. 2001. An interactive displacement
method for conflict resolution in map generalization. Algorithmica
Vol. 30, pp. 287-301.
McKeown ,D., McMahill, J., and Caldwell, D. 1999. The use of
spatial context in linear feature simplification. Geo computation.
www.geovista.psu.edu/sites/geocomp99/gc99/02/gc 020.htm.
McMaster, R. B., and K.S. Shea, 1992. Vector-based generalization
in generalization in digital cartography (Washington D.C.:
Association of American Geographers, pp. 71-98.
McMaster, R. B., 2001. Measurement in generalization. Proceedings
of the 20th international cartography conference; August 6-10,
Beijing, China, pp. pp 2082.
McMaster, R. B. and Shea, S., 1992.. Generalization in digital
cartography. American Association of Geographers, Washington.
McMaster, R. B., Shea, S., 1989. Cartographic generalization in a
digital environment. when and how to generalize. Proceedings, 9th
International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography. pp.56-
67.
Meng, L., 1997. An in-depth investigation on the long lasting
problem of cartographic generalization. Technical Report, Swedish
Armed Force, VEB Viak, May 1997, pp. 1-75.
Monmonier M. S., and R. B. McMaster, 1991. The sequential effects
of the geometric operators in cartographic line generalization.
International yearbook of cartography.
Muller, Jean-Claude, Jean-Philipe Lagrange and Robert Weibel,
Editors. 1995. GIS and Generalization: Methodologv and
Practice. Taylor & Francis. 0-7484-0319-1.
Muller, J. C., 1995, GIS and generalization. Taylor & Francis.
Nakos, B., 1999, Comparison of manual versus digital line
generalization. Proceedings of the Workshop on Generalization,
Ottawa, Canada August 12-14, 1999
Oosterom, P.V., 1995. The GAP-tree, an approach to 'on-the-fly' map
generalization of an area partitioning. GIS and generalization -