004
eria
be
the
ites
one
the
yuld
are
rlap
d.
International Archives
of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004
ul
m
Figure 5: weakness of buffer method in the condition of near inter-city roads sub criteria multiplicity
There must be a way to answer to this question “how
much is the distance between two respective criteria
based on kilometers?” for this reason the method that
is suggested in this theses is presented in formula 8.
Hx 8
In this formula Kx show that how much is the distance
between two existing criterion “x” , L shows the
length of each route part, nx shows the quantity of the
criterion “x” in each route part.
After the calculation, the Kx relevant to each route
part should be determined in a way that shows that in
which part this criterion works well, in which one it
works in an average level and finally in which one it
has an improper performance, after dividing the Kx
zones for the mentioned criterion, the AHP method is
implemented and the weight of each zone is
determined. This issue that weather this zone division
has been done properly and what is the best status,
itself needs further deep and careful investigations.
The criteria, which follow this method, are as follows.
For the sub criteria of security criterion, sub criteria of
marginal parking lots, service departments,
mechanical and technical assistant departments, health
and clinical service departments and
telecommunication departments and sub criteria of
service and terminal departments from the main
criterion of facilities the average quantity of
kilometers method was applied. Zones and relevant
coefficients to each zone are calculated and presented
in tables 5,6,7,8,9,and 10.
Table 5: the coefficients of sub criteria of marginal parking lots, security criterion C= 0.04
Zone Kp «2 2« Kp.« l0 Kp» 10
(good) (average) Weak
Weight 0.589 0.357 0.054
Table (6): The coefficients of sub criteria of service department and technical and mechanical services, security
criterion
Zone Kc«3 3«Kc «20 Kc» 20
(good) (average) (weak)
Weight 0.542 0.396 0.062
Table(7): The coefficients of sub criteria of health and clinical services, security criterion
Zone Kh « 20 20« Kh « 70 Kh» 70
(good) (average) (weak)
Weight 0.735 0.178 0.087
Table (8): The coefficients of sub criterion of telecommunication departments, security criterion
Zone Kc « 30 30 « Kc « 100 Kc > 100
(good) (average) (weak)
Weight 0.577 0.324 0.081