International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004
MRDB
WFS
Request N
WES p
"| Request
LoD low low LoD data
low LoD data
Figure 3. Receive data for multiscale map from MRDB via
repeated WFS-request
5. CASE STUDIES
This section describes several applications of utilising an
MRDB for creating individual maps in real-time.
5.1 Variable-scale maps
A major problem with mobile maps is their small displays,
which puts high demands on the selection of cartographic data
to be shown. This becomes problematic when the user requires
a considerable amount of cartographic information. In personal
navigation, for example, users often need both a detailed map of
the area surrounding the current position as well as an overview
map. This means, in cartographic terms, that the user requires
both large-scale and small-scale cartographic data. To
overcome this problem a map can be created where the scale in
the middle (close to the user’s position) is larger than the scale
in the border areas of the display (Figure 4). Details of the type
of variable-scale map used in this case study are given in Harrie
et al. (2002).
Small-scale data
User’s
position
€
Large-scale
data
Figure 4. The figure illustrates the circular cap (with
radius ry) where large-scale data is shown and
the area outside this cap where small-scale data
is shown. (Harrie et al., 2003)
The main problem of creating a good variable-scale map is that
the level of detail in the cartographic information should be
different in the centre of the map than in the border area of the
display. For this an MRDB is very useful.
Figure 5 shows a variable scale map created in real-time using
an MRDB. The map was briefly created as follows. First a WFS
request was performed to the small-scale layer in the MRDB. In
the processing layer then the built-up areas in the centre of the
map were identified. By using the MRDB links a new request
was performed that requested the buildings (from a large-scale
layer in the MRDB) within these built-up areas. These buildings
then replaced the built-up areas. Finally, the variable scale map
was created by a coordinate transformation.
Figure 5. A variable-scale map created using an MRDB.
To create a variable-scale map, such the one in Figure 5, is
fairly fast. The process that takes most time in our experiments
is the transferring of data from the server to the client. Since the
built-up areas objects contain much less data compared to
corresponding building objects, the MRDB is an efficient
approach for this application. It would take longer time to
request all building objects and generalise the outer part of the
map (by aggregation) than utilising an MRDB. And most likely,
the result is visually more appealing if an MRDB is used.
5.2 Emphasise landmarks and points of interest
For general purposes maps, which serve for a lot more than
only one person, the basic principle exists to present similar
objects in a similar manner (Hake et al. 2002). The advantage
of the non-printed mobile maps is to take the special needs of
the user into account while creating the map. The user is
interested in certain objects more than in other objects. For
instance while navigating the user is interested in landmarks,
eye-catching objects or points of interest located within a
certain distance from the users position.
To emphasise these objects in the map several possibilities are
cogitable. In order to visualise one individual building in the
generalised data set a possibility is to use graphic variables like
colour, size or the shape of the object (Figure 6 left). At this
point the problem occurs that in a certain scale the objects are
generalised which e.g. means the buildings are for instance
amalgamated which in turn means that we can't localise a single
object to point out a landmark or a point of interest (Pol).
Alternatively, the position of the Pol's can be marked with a dot
or special symbol (Figure 6 right).
Figure 6. Emphasise Pol using color (left) or symbol (right).
This however hides underlying structures and prevents exact
identification of buildings. Thus, a combination of this
individual building and the generalised background buildings is
desirable, given in Figure 7 (right) with detailed buildings and
aggregated builtup areas.
138
Inte
This
Firs
requ
of
gen
orig
lead
deta
On
obje
han
rem
the «
In tl
prov
The:
of t
obje
of a
53
Ano
the
user
map
locat
is pa
resct
navi,
infor
certa
Fron
objec
This
with
reque
linke
deep!
plan
5.4
In so
not c
exam
whicl
map «
in the
"nam
can a