bul 2004
order to
uch as
iminated
ted and
ig to its
pes such
sified in
he solid
nstituted
ed. This
n define
| points,
features
ngulated
wrong z
iction of
' values.
orrectly.
rom the
ures can
teractive
lates the
method
o
ılly with
method
. In this
It. Thus,
»leted in
ngulated
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004
surface is converted to 250.000 sampling points and
grid/lattice (see Figure 5).
Po Oa AOI FE Te a MR ee tue
soi
Figure 5. Lattice of the surface
42 Editing The Vertical Differences of The Buildings and
Solid Modeling the Buildings
Like the z errors in the point clouds, the buildings have
height errors in it as well. The reason of these errors is again
arises during stereo compilation like other z errors. Operators
sometimes see different points other then the roof corners of
the building (Figure 6). Even if they compile it with true z
value, it appears as an error when seen from the perspective.
For instance he/she can set the floating mark on the surface
instead of roof. They can not be realized from the top view
(see Figure 6). So that errors can not be edited during 2D
editing phase. This kind of errors is very rare, but can be
encountered and needs high attention (Emem, 2002a).
SES 5 >
J e <=
ar ^
za NN.
|
|
|
1
Figure 6. Wrong point compilation error
The other error arises because of the roof corner height
differences. Despite the operator compiles the building
correctly, this error comes from the nature of the view and it
433
is inevitable. Normally the height of the building corners
should have the same height value. But some buildings which
have triangle roof types are compiled with different height
values (see Figure 7).
Figure 7. Triangle roof
This kind of buildings can not be realized like the preceding
error during the 2D editing phase (Figure 8).
Figure 8. Height difference of the roof
Even if both errors are not critical for conventional usage of
maps, they are important errors for 3D city modeling.
Therefore these errors should be corrected before solid
modeling the buildings.
If we consider the compilation process of buildings, the
operator starts from a corner of the upper point of the
building. Therefore, there are 2 ways to correct height
differences on the buildings. First, accepting the arithmetical
average value of the building data points. But this assumption
causes changes on the values from the real values. Other way
is to assume the correct value as the first compilation data
point the building. Because, operators generally fix the
parallax on the first data point correctly and more carefully in
addition the most of them start to compilation from upper
point of the building instead of the roof corner (Emem,
2002a). In this study, the first data point of the building is
assumed as the correct value. Therefore all the buildings on
the project area were edited with the accepted height values
(see Figure 9, 10). Some buildings on the project area such as
stadium and complex shaped hotel were edited separately
from others.
Figure 9. Correcting values according to accepted value