Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 4)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
ANOVA df SS MS 
Regression 1 38189791 38189792 
Residual 1312 107881906 82227.06 
Total 1313 146071698 
F= 464.4 Significance F 1.96E-88 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 7. ANOVA of the linear regression between mean 
gradient and mean elevation of the barren terrain class objects. 
  
    
    
  
  
2000 4————————————9———— —————————— 
T 160ü a ; - 
* ++ + } . 
m 1200 PA pr EN | 
e ro + pere $e. ^ 4 4T eM . | 
o 800 t, uw. ESS Ny =: Ste AT | 
= * e Mt rta POM Rios. —o*t, pi t 2 e | 
= 2, {SHENG Fe de ac TAS IH * | 
400 - Ares LU fry a AF anum Aen uet | 
gi he Trl ag: ny ; | 
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 
Mean G 
  
  
  
Figure 8. Linear regression line and scatter diagram. 
The objects wer sliced to 5 classes in increasing mean gradient 
and mapped (Figure 9). 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 9. Gradient classes. 
3. CONCLUSSION 
The geomorphometric description of the cluter map indicated 
that the major landcover classes (forest versus cultivate land 
versus bare ground) present specific and distinct parametric 
representation. The barren class presents high elevation and 
gradient while the correlation and the linear regression 
inidicated that the greatest in size objects occupy the greatest in 
height position and present the greatest gradient. This finding 
should be taken into account in the urban planning since barren 
class object are distribute along the major highway that 
connects the major city with the major port of this island 
(Kefalonia). 
4. REFERENCES 
l. Abrams, M. Hook S., 2002. ASTER user handbook 
version 2. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 135 p. 
2. ASTER 2003. ASTER WEB PAGE. 
http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/ (accessed 18 Jan. 2003). 
3. Chavez, P, 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections 
revisited and revised. Photogrammetric Engineering and 
Remote Sensing, 62, pp. 1025-1036. 
4. Eastman J. 1999. Idrisi 32: guide to GIS and image 
processing, volume 2. Clark Labs, Worcester, 169 p. 
Elumnoh A., Shrestha R., 2000. Application of digital 
elevation data to Landsat image classification. 
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, pp. 297- 
304 
6. Evans, LS., 1980. An integrated system for terrain analysis 
and slope mapping. Zeitschrift fuer Geomorphologie N.F. 
Suppl.-Bd., 36, pp. 274-290. 
7.  Florinsky I., 1998. Accuracy of local topographic variables 
derived from digital elevation models. Int. J. of 
Geographical Information Science, 12, pp. 47-61. 
8. Fujisada, H., 1998. ASTER Level 1 data processing 
algorithm. /EEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote 
Sensing, 36, pp. 1101-1112. 
9. Kahle, A, et al., 1991. The advanced spaceborne thermal 
emission & reflectance radiometer (ASTER). /nternational 
Journal of Imaging Systems & Technology, 3, pp.144 -156. 
10. Mark, D., 1975. Geomorphometric parameters: a review 
and evaluation. Geographiska Annaler, 57A(10), pp. 1461- 
1467. 
11. Mather, P., 1987. Computer processing of remotely-sensed 
images. John Wiley & Son, New York, 352 p. 
12. Miliaresis, G., 1999a. A region-growing algorithm for the 
segmentation of alluvial fans from 
wh 
digital elevation 
models. 1” Imaging 
Applications in Geology (GeoVision 99), Liege, Belgium, 
6-7 May, pp. 189-192. 
13. Miliaresis, G., 1999b. Automated Segmentation of 
Alluvial Fans to Regions of High to Intermediate Flood 
Hazard from Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery. 2nd Int. 
Symposium Operationalization of Remote Sensing, ITC 
Enschede, 16-20 August., 6 pages. 
14. Miliaresis, G., 2001. Extraction of bajadas from digital 
elevation models and satellite imagery. Computers & 
Geosciences, 27, pp.1159-1169. 
Panagou Th, Miliaresis G., 2003. Urban landcover 
classification by the use of ASTER imagery. 4th Int. 
Symposium of Remote Sensing of Urban, Areas, 27-29 
June, Regensberg (Germany), 6 pages. 
16. Pike R., 2002. A bibliography of terrain modeling 
(Geomorphometry), the quantitative representation of 
topography, supplement 4.0. US Geological Survey, Open- 
File-Report 02-465, Menlo Park, CA, 157 p. 
17. Treitz P., Howarth P., 2000. Integrating spectral, spatial 
and terrain variables for forest ecosystem classification. 
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 66, pp. 
305-317. 
18. White, K., 1993. Assessing flood hazards on dryland 
piedmonts using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. 
Proceedings of the Remote Sensing Society, Chester 
College, United Kingdom, September 16-17, 8 pages 
International] Symposium on 
un 
4.1 Acknowledgements and Appendix (optional) 
Acknowledgements of US Geological Survey for providing the 
A.S.T.E.R image used in this research effort.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.