Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 4)

u 2004 
cessing 
'rentice 
Boston: 
on and 
lishing 
logical 
. Image 
tomatic 
a Shift- 
esearch, 
it 96 A, 
ygnition 
ce and 
Tehran 
omatics 
Remote 
mmetry, 
emotely 
nposium 
wa. 
Itisensor 
ire and 
vidence. 
n — the 
of the 
mation 
on data 
FUSION OF MULTISENSOR REMOTE SENSING DATA: 
ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF RESULTING IMAGES 
E. Saroglu, F. Bektas, N. Musaoglu, C. Goksel 
a 
ITU, Civil Engineering Faculty, 34469 Maslak Istanbul, Turkey Istanbul 
saroglue@itu.edu.tr, bektasfi@itu.edu.tr 
Commission IV, WG IV/7 
KEY WORDS : IRS, Landsat TM, SPOT, Radar, Fusion techniques, Land cover, Land use, Accuracy. 
ABSTRACT: 
The primary attention of this study was to examine what improvement can be obtained for classification accuracies by using 
different merging techniques done with multisensor dataset. In this study, the existing fusion techniques that preserve spectral 
characteristics, while increase spatial characteristic such as Principle Component Analysis, Intensity-Hue-Saturation, Brovey and 
Multiplicative algorithms were applied to multi sensor data set. IRS 1 D Pan, LISS III and ERS images were used. Using fusion 
techniques IRS 1 D imagery combined with LISS III data and ERS radar data combined with LISS III remotely sensed data. 
Maximum Likelihood classification algorithm was applied to classify fused imageries. Before classification procedure training sites 
were selected for all various land cover/use categories. Classification accuracy assessment was calculated using an error matrix for 
all images. Finally, the results of classification accuracy were compared and the best result was obtained by combining IRS 1 D 
  
  
image with LISS III data by means of IHS colour transformation technique. 
I. INTRODUCTION 
Wald (2002) describes fusion as ‘a formal frame work in which 
are expressed means and tools for the alliance of data orginating 
from different sources. It aims at obtaining information of 
greater quality; the exact definition of greater quality will 
depend upon application’. The data fusion of multisensor data 
has received tremendous attention in the remote sensing 
literature (Yao and Gilbert, 1984; Welch and Ehlers, 1988; 
Chavez et al., 1991; Weydahl et al., 1995; Niemann et al., 1998; 
Pohl et al, 1998; Saraf, 1999; Zhang, 1999; Gamba and 
Houshmand, 1999). The integration of spectrally and spatially 
complementary remote multi sensor data can facilitate visual 
and automatic image interpretation (Zhou et al, 1998). Data 
fusion is the combination of multi source data which have 
different characteristics such as, temporal, spatial, spectral and 
radiometric to acquire high quality image. The fusion of 
different sensor images is crucial method for many remote 
sensing applications such as land cover/ land use mapping. 
There is a huge variety of techniques to combine images from 
different sensors. However, this paper focuses on image fusion 
techniques that preserve spectral characteristics whilst 
increasing spatial resolution to provide images of greater 
quality. IRS 1 D Pan, LISS III and ERS images were fused by 
using Brovey, Multiplicative, IHS and PCA algorithms. All 
merged images were classified by means of Maximum 
Likelihood supervised classification technique. The overall 
accuracy and Kappa analysis were used to perform a 
classification accuracy assessment based on error matrix 
analysis. The quality of the fused images was examined by 
comparing classification accuracy results. 
2. STUDY AREA 
In this study, the region which is located southwest of Istanbul 
between 41 6' 13"- 40 55' 36" latitude and 28 37" 3"- 28 54' 11" 
longitude was selected as study area (figure 1). It comprises 
approximately 400 km? area which contains the diversity of 
land cover types and surface materials such as urban-built up, 
vegetation, water, agricultural field, Transit European 
Motorway and Yesilkôy Atatürk Airport. Land use in study site 
is very cosmopolitan and irregular. Most buildings in the area 
are small, form closely and do not have roof. The streets in the 
city are narrow. 
beet 
    
  
MIDDLE 
EAST 
Figure 1. Study area 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.