Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 4)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
  
  
  
(j) Multiplicative transform of ERS and LISS III (k) Brovey transform of ERS and LISS III 
Figure 2. The visual comparison of the merging methods from IRS 1 D Pan, LISS III and ERS images. 
3.4.2 Classification 
Maximum likelihood supervised classification and classification 
accuracy assessment were applied to all fused images. In order 
to select training sites for the classification 1/5000 scaled 
standart topographic maps and aerial photographs were used. 
Urban, grass land, barren land, water and highways were 
selected as classes to represent the surface of study area. After 
signature extraction, accuracy assessment of classification was 
calculated using an error matrix, which showed the accuracy of 
both the producer and the user (Lillesand and Kiefer 2000). The 
classification accuracy in remote sensing shows the 
correspondence between a class label allocated to pixel and true 
class. For accuracy assessment, 250 pixels were randomly 
selected for each image. Land use maps and aerial photographs 
were used as reference data to observe true classes. The overall 
accuracy and a Kappa analysis were used to perform a 
classification accuracy assessment based on error matrix 
analysis. Table 1 shows overall accuracy and kappa values for 
the classification of fused images. 
  
  
  
  
  
Fusion technique ‘Overall % Kappa % 
Brovey (IRS Pan+LISS) 80 74,5 
Multiplicative (IRS Pan+LISS) 77,6 70,1 
HIS (IRS Pan+LISS) 83,2 78,9 
PCA (IRS Pan+LISS) : 82,8 77,6 
Multiplicative (ERS +LISS) 70,4 58,3 
Brovey (ERS +LISS) 12 61,5 
HIS (ERS +LISS) 75,6 66,6 
PCA (ERS +LISS) 72 63,1 
  
  
Table 1. Classification accuracy results of fused images. 
4. CONCLUSIONS 
By using fusion techniques visual interpretability of images 
were improved. Furthermore, detailed land cover/use 
information was obtained by classification of fused data. As a 
result of containing very complex and irrregular features, land 
cover/use categories are highly spatially intermixed in the study 
site. Due to similar reflectance values of urban, road and bare 
land class, mixed pixel problems were occurred during the 
classification process. The reason of similar reflectance 
578 
between these categories is the result of irregular and roofless 
buildings. According to classification results, the best result for 
the study site was obtained by using IHS colour transformation 
technique with overall accuracy of 83.2 % and kappa value of 
77.6 %. In order to investigate appropriateness of fusion 
techniques a pilot area that has regular urban structure was 
selected and maximum likelihood classifications were applied 
to this data. The results showed that classification accuracy 
assessment values are better for the pilot area. The best result 
was obtained for the pilot site by means of IHS colour 
transformation with overall accuracy of 88.4 % and kappa value 
of 82.3 %. The classification accuracies of radar and LISS 
merged images were around 70 % because of the complex 
structure of the area. Merged radar and multi spectral data 
improved visual interpretability of radar image, these images 
can be used as ancillary data for classification procedure. For 
the aim of this study, the results of merged optic images were 
satisfactory for producing land cover map of the area. 
5. REFERENCES 
Chavez, P.S., Sides, S.C., Anderson, J.A., 1991. Comparison of 
three different methods to merge multi resolution and multi 
spectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT  Panchromatic. 
PhotogrammetricEngineering and Remote Sensing, 577 (3), 295— 
303. 
Chena, C. M., Hepnerb, G. F., and Forsterb R. R., 2003. Fusion 
of hyperspectral and radar data using the IHS transformation to 
enhance urban surface features. ISPRS Journal of 
Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 58 , pp. 19— 30. 
Gamba, P., Houshmand, B., 1999. Three-dimensional road 
network by fusion of polarimetric and interferometric SAR 
data. Proceedings of IGARSS’99 I, 302- 304. 
Janssen L. F. and Vander W. J., 1994. Accuracy A Review. 
Photogrametric Engineering and Remote Sensing, pp.419-425. 
Jensen, J.R., 1996. Merging different types of remotely sensed 
data for effective visual display. Introductory Digital Image 
Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 2nd ed. Prentice- 
Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 100— 103. 
Interi 
  
Lille: 
Imag 
Niem 
1998. 
with 
Interi 
174— 
Pohl, 
in T 
Interi 
Sara 
apprc 
Inter 
Wald 
Archi 
Welc 
with 
Jourr 
Weyc 
ERS- 
Proce 
Sensi 
Yao, 
aperti 
sensi 
Remo 
Zhan 
spatia 
(10), 
Zhou. 
transí 
Panct 
(4), 7
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.