International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004
5.2 — Variations of agricultural production
On graph 3 and 4, the percentages of cocoa production was
greater (10.78 %) from 1995 to 1997 and smaller (8.98 %)
from 1997 to 2002. The trend is the same for cassava. We can
conclude that there was reduction of agricultural production of
the households due to the project. The delimitation of the route
of the project was not precise and the households were advised
to abandon the area concerned because the width of pipeline
was estimated from 30 to 60 meter and was very difficult to
appreciate by the farmers. The production of palm trees
increases from 4.19 % in 1995-1997 to 9.28 % in 1997-2002
because in 1995-1997 the young plants were not in their
production phase. The cassava+LC production has decreased
simultaneously like cocoa. This shows that cocoa is the main
cash product in that zone, and cassava+LC the main food
crops. We also remark that high production of cassava+LC was
due to the instability of the cocoa prices in the international
market, and cassava+LC can be easily sold in the local market
and provide money for socio-economic security of the
households.
Figure 3: Variation in agricultural productions
between 1995 and 1997
w
©
Percentages
À 2 NN
Co o +O nO
| loeo eed
Rn SRI
Cocoa Palm tree Cassava * LC
Different crops
Wi Greater Bi Equal El Smaller
Figure 4: Changes in agricultural Production
between 1997 and 2002
257 |
Er
20 |
uv
Sr
z | | @ Greater
e 107 Bl Equal
o | D Smaller
"|
Cacao Palmtree | Cassavad C
Different crops
808
5.3 — Variations in agricultural incomes
Graphs 5 and 6 show that the cocoa incomes from cocoa were
smaller (8.38 %) in 1995-1997 and higher (10.48 %) in 1997-
2002. This is due to the high cocoa prices in the international
market in 1999-2002. The impairment of the palm oil
production is due to the supply and low demand in the local
market. The income from cassava + LC decreased from 42.12
% in 1995-1997 to 23.95 % in 1997-2002. We can estimate
that this reduction of incomes from cassava is due to
consumption or the reduction of cultivated areas.
Fiqure 6: Variation in agricultural incomes
between 1997 and 2002
25
201
vo
o > E
8 154
E & Greater
2 10 BEqual |
a L1 Smaller
Cacao Palmtree ^ Cassava C
Different crops
Figure 5: Variation in agricultural incomes between
1995 and 1997
MENT F :
457 4
wf
t i 1 [1 Greater
S a5 P gEqu |
40 z Smale
sb
0
The
the
on
wh
Mi:mharehaar
The
hos
The
cen
bet
hou
wel
the
em]
that
Oth
maı
the