Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 4)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
Figure 5. Stereomapping with MER MI images in SOCET 
SET based on relative orientation without a priori informa- 
tion. Left, anaglyph from two overlapping MI frames 
obtained by MER-B (Opportunity) rover in Meridiani 
Planum. Region shown is ~3 cm high. Spherules (informally 
known as "blueberries") are hematite-rich concretions a few 
mm in diameter. A third MI frame (not shown) provided 
stereo coverage overlapping this pair to the right. Upper 
right: Orthomosaic with contours of "clevation" (in camera- 
aligned local coordinate system, hence essentially range) 
derived from the two overlapping stereopairs. CI 250 um 
with 1000 um index contours; range precision is 30 um. 
Lower right: perspective view from top, no exaggeration. 
constraint is quite weak. As a preliminary approach to our 
analysis, we demonstrated that a relative orientation of a MI 
stereopair can be performed in SOCET SET without a priori 
orientation information (except that the two camera stations 
were at the best-focus distance from the target, with roughly 
similar pointing) or constraints. Figure 5 illustrates a 
microscopic DEM obtained in this way. In order to merge MI 
images with Pancam color data, however, it is necessary to 
model the constrained motions of multiple cameras in a 
consistent coordinate system. 
4.3 Methodology 
We are mecting the requirement to merge MI and Pancam 
images by implementing a very general processing software 
design that includes models of all the MER cameras (except 
the Hazcams, which could easily be added), their constrained 
motions, and a large number of related coordinate frames 
needed to describe these motions. Processing is generally 
divided into "2D" steps performed in ISIS and "3D" steps 
done in SOCET SET, as described in Section 3, and in detail 
resembles the approach developed for the Pancam-like 
Imager for Mars Pathfinder (Gaddis et al., 1999; Kirk et al., 
1999). This includes the implementation of a series of 
projections relevant to lander/rover data as opposed to 
global cartography, such as panoramic, planimetric, and 
oblique orthographic. Bundle-adjustment software must be 
implemented in ISIS because the SOCET SET adjustment 
module cannot incorporate the needed constraints. Finally, 
the SOCET SET stereomatching software is not designed to 
handle images at multiple azimuths and high elevations 
relative to the coordinate grid. ISIS must therefore be used 
to supply SOCET SET with the orientation of each stereopair 
in a "local" coordinate frame with its Z axis roughly parallel 
to the camera boresights. DEMs and orthoimages can be 
produced in this system and transformed back to a "global" 
coordinate frame in the process of exporting them back to 
ISIS for further processing. 
The Mars Pathfinder mission had only one camera system on 
a fixed lander, and hence had one "local" coordinate frame 
     
          
i Sy = aan P EZ : eX 
Figure 6. Left: Controlled mosaic (~1500 pixels wide) of 
two MER-A MI frames showing 4.5-cm area of rock 
"Mazatzal" partly cleared of dust by brushing with Rock 
Abrasion Tool. Center: Quasi-natural color Pancam image 
of same area, resolution ~0.5 mm/pixel. Right: MI and 
Pancam images merged show correlation of color, texture. 
(fixed in the camera head) and one key "global" frame (fixed 
in the lander and oriented to the vertical and north), 
Processing software for Pathfinder (including bundle 
adjustment) was therefore implemented by hard-coding the 
single type of local-global transformation. For MER, this 
software had to be generalized to handle coordinates local to 
several cameras, intermediate coordinates used to model the 
motion of the Pancam mast and instrument arm, and "global" 
coordinate frames both moving with the rover and fixed at 
the initial landing point or subsequent sites of exploration. 
Fortunately, a powerful mechanism for computing the trans- 
formations between the many coordinate frames has been 
provided by the NASA Navigation Ancillary Information 
Facility (NAIF; http://pds-naif.jpl.nasa.gov). NAIF supplies 
Frames Kernels (or F-Kernels) that define the relations 
between all coordinate frames used by MER (and other 
missions) in terms of C-Kernels and SP-Kernels that contain 
the rotations and translations, respectively, between frames. 
The C- and SP-Kernels can be time-dependent and are 
continuously updated as the mission proceeds. Routines in 
the NAIF software library can then be used to obtain the 
transformation linking any frame to any other at any time. 
By using the NAIF kernels and library routines, we are able 
to compute the a priori orientation of any MER camera in 
any frame of interest, which allows us to transfer images into 
SOCET SET, perform unconstrained bundle adjustments 
there, make DEMs and orthomosaics, and transform these 
back into ISIS. This capability suffices to make MI products 
and merge them with Pancam data (Figure 6). We are 
currently working to extend the NAIF software to compute 
the partial derivatives of the frame transformations, and to 
implement a bundle-adjustment program based on the 
modified frames software. This adjustment program will 
permit us to make controlled panoramic and planimetric 
mosaics of Pancam and Navcam images, and to reconstruct 
the paths of the rovers by linking images obtained from 
successive stops (cf. Li et al., 2004; Xu, 2004). 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
We thank the many individuals at the USGS, Flagstaff who contributed 
to the work reported: I. Anderson, B. Archinal, J. Barrett, K. Becker, 
D. Cook, G. Cushing, E. Eliason, L. Gaddis, D. Galuszka, T. Hare, E. 
Howington-Kraus, C. Isbell, J. Johnson, B. Redding, M. Rosiek, L. 
Soderblom, R. Sucharski, T. Sucharski, T. Titus, and J. Torson. The 
work was supported by the following NASA programs: Mars Data 
Analysis, Mars Express Mission, and Mars Exploration Rovers 
Mission. 
REFERENCES 
Albertz, J., et al., 1992. The camera experiments HRSC and 
WAOSS on the Mars 94 mission. Int. Arch. Photogramm 
Remote Sens., 29(B1), pp. 130-137. 
Archinal, B.A., et al., 2004. Preparing for THEMIS controlled 
global Mars mosaics. Lunar Planet. Scil, XXXV, Abstract # 
1903, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston (CD-ROM). 
Bell, J.F., III, et al, 2003. Mars Exploration Rover Athena 
Panoramic Camera (Pancam) investigation. J. Geophys. Res. 
108(E12), 8063, doi: 10.1029/2003JE002070. 
Interr 
Chris 
of th 
Scier 
Dorr 
HR S¢ 
Int. / 
Ebne 
HRS 
Arch. 
Elacl 
of Re 
Elias 
the I 
Luna 
Gadc 
Softy 
Sei, 
Hou: 
Gad 
Path: 
of a 
Geo} 
Haul 
resul 
Mar: 
(this 
Heif 
extr: 
miss 
Herl 
inve 
10.1 
Jako 
inert 
Geo, 
Kiet 
Mar 
82, 
Kirk 
two- 
Calt 
Kirk 
Rec 
Flag 
Pho. 
Kirk 
the 
land 
pp. 
Kirl 
can 
narr 
10.1 
Kirl 
Pho 
IV/A
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.