— <
wu gc
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
associated with collapsed buildings exhibits a higher spectral
return than the standing structure. Although considerable
damage was also sustained in western Golcuk, reduced
differences may be due to suppressed reflectance values where
smoke from the burring Tupras oil refinery was present in the
upper atmosphere. Positive differences are limited to the ‘Sunk’
coastal stretch, where reflectance values have fallen following
widespread inundation.
LEGEND
-200
-100
-50
-25
100
200
rro
a) Difference damage
0.25
0.50
0.75
>0.75
: TOT HR "ui TOA apn CAA ur 4
(b) Correlation damage map
x
3 UN
os
ge map
a
cS.
(c) Block correlation dama
Figure 4 SPOT damage maps. Areas of high positive difference
and low correlation correspond with the Golcuk city center,
which from Figure 3b sustained severe and widespread building
damage. See text for explanation of annotations C1-C3.
Results for the block and window-based correlation (Figure 4b
and Figure 4c) are overlaid with a base map of Golcuk. For
visualization purposes, all values are displayed as positive,
since the magnitude rather than the direction of change is of
interest. For both block and sliding window-based results, areas
of low correlation (displayed in red) are concentrated in central
Golcuk (see annotation C1). As for the difference values, the
damage map in Figure 3b confirms that building collapse was
widespread. A low level of correlation around the subsidence
613
zone (C2) is due to the change in reflectance following
inundation. Low correlation offshore (C3) is probably
attributable to the random or chaotic patterns of surface
reflectance associated with wind-driven wave action.
Figure 5 depicts the SAR intensity responses for Golcuk. For
visualization purposes, the difference image in Figure 5a was
thresholded at -7.0 « dif « 7.0, with intermediate values
displayed across an 8-bit range using a linear contrast stretch.
Similarly, correlation images in Figure 5b and Figure 5c were
thresholded at 0.2 « cor « 0.6. Block correlation statistics were
further classified into categories of: low (0 « bk cor « 0.2);
moderate (0.2 « bk cor « 0.4); high (0.4 « bk cor « 0.6); and
very high (bk cor » 0.6). The coherence image in Figure 5d
was thresholded at 0.3 « coh « 0.6.
t
A
0 0.2 04 0.6 20.6 0.3 0 0.6
(c) Block correlation map (d) Coherence map
Figure 5 SAR damage maps. Areas of low correlation
correspond with Golcuk city center, which from Figure 3b
sustained severe and widespread building damage. See text for
explanation of annotations C1-C2
From Figure 5a, the magnitude of SAR intensity difference is
low compared with its optical counterpart. It is difficult to
discern any obvious regularity in response, with the urban
centre exhibiting an amalgam of positive and negative values.
Low correlation (see annotation Cl in Figure 5c) is evident
throughout central areas of Golcuk. Once again, this
corresponds with high levels of building collapse (Figure 3b).
Low correlation outside the urban area is concentrated around
Izmit Bay (C2), where changing water surface conditions cause
differences in backscatter. In Figure 5d, low coherence is
present throughout both urban and rural areas, suggesting that
this measure has limited ability to distinguish earthquake
building damage from other modes of change.
3.1.3 Damage severity: From the zone-based damage profiles
in Figure 6, panchromatic imagery yields an encouraging trend
between difference and damage state (Figure 6a). As the
percentage of collapsed buildings increases from class A to E,