Full text: Proceedings of the Symposium on Progress in Data Processing and Analysis

and in another example the maximum image blur in the cen 
troid of exposure would, for the instantaneous oscillatio- 
nal state: uj = — o* , occur approximately along 
the entire left and right frame margins, and the minimum 
along the entire frame centre line in flying direction. 
With a real photographic shutter (efficiency between 70 7. 
and 80 7., the practical image motion will be reduced by 
about 25 7. relative to the theoretical motion of 50 jL\m with 
an ideal shutter (efficiency = 100 7.) /1/. In combination 
with the increase of 25 7. mentioned earlier, image motion 
can, in practice, be deduced only from roll, in a first 
approximation. In any case, however, image motion varies 
from one exposure to the next subject to a random process 
involving all angular motion components, since there is no 
connection between the temporal characteristic of the 
angular velocity amplitude and the moment of exposure. 
Consequently, an image with intolerable blur may directly 
follow an image with high or extra-high resolution in case 
of long shutter speeds. Thus, even with an exposure time 
limitation as mentioned above, there is still a statistic 
distribution of well defined and less defined images, but 
even the maximum image blur will remain within tolerance. 
In consideration of these findings, techniques of motion 
compensation have been proposed and, together with the 
cooperating parties, developed up to the level of inventive 
merit. These techniques contain a dynamically attitude- 
stabilized platform according to /4/ for all sensing sy 
stems, the selection of the moment of exposure in phases of 
minimal angular motion according to /5/ for cameras and 
according to /6/ for scanners with electronic pixel selec 
tion from a matrix to form an instantaneous nominal scan 
ning line which corresponds to the desired flying attitude 
(Fig. 2). 
A platform dynamically stabilized in three axes has been 
integrated into the new Jena-made photographic system LMK- 
2000 and tested in flight by INTERFLUG. 
Fig. 2 : 
Detector array (1) with a no*i- 
y nal scan line directed verti 
cally downward (5) and looking 
a head with the »otion 
ranges (2,3,4,7 and 10) 
162
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.