te, 1999 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
111 
: number of 
raging, when 
deviation of 
tosen. Each 
with the 
multi spectral 
tg technique, 
: differences 
ission of the 
the variation 
; the objects 
vith a high 
illage left of 
n the fused 
•mation that 
the spectral 
ime of the 
onfirms the 
sification of 
ied with the 
r pattern of 
significantly 
ixel objects, 
i a different 
3ns did not 
ctral image, 
i some areas 
w much the 
y the fusion 
image once 
identical as 
stimated by 
i of and the 
the original 
le degraded 
a 5x5 filter 
iresents the 
ges and the 
;an (p.) and 
bands. The 
ilues of the 
n the mean 
ed. This is 
rocess. IHS 
values and 
from the 
latic image, 
le standard 
(a) 
(c) 
Fig. 2. Comparison of Fusion techniques, (a) original multispectral image, (b) panchromatic image, 
(c) result of AIF. (d) result of IHS merging. (© Euromap 1997) 
(a) (b) (c) 
Fig. 3. Multispectral classification based on (a) original image, (b) AIF image, and (c) IHS image.