Full text: International cooperation and technology transfer

33 
Owning to the receiver hardware development a very 
performing differential kinematic method can be presently 
adopted for road survey. This technique can be applied with the 
availability of a single receivers, of course the ROVER. The 
differential positioning is possible thanks to corrections send to 
GPS ROVER receiver trough a satellite communications link. 
The corrections computed using a network of reference stations 
are transmitted in a standard format known as RTCM-104 
(Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services, 1990). 
The receivers is equipped with to different antennas, one for 
receiving GPS signal and one for the differential corrections. 
The performance of this technique, still within the range of 1 -s- 
2 meters, is not distance dependent since it do not require any 
reference station. The only limitation is the visibility of the 
communications satellite. 
This flexible and low cost positioning method was carefully 
examined in this work in consideration of its potential 
suitability for road survey. 
3. FIELD EXPERIMENTS 
In order to check the effective performance of differential GPS 
techniques for highway survey, different field experiments were 
carried out. Different models of TRIMBLE receivers were used 
with particular attention to the Pro XR/XRS receiver, which 
support the use of satellite transmitted RTCM-104 correction. 
The receivers and the software adopted during tests are listed in 
table 1. 
RECEIVER 
Trimble Pro XR/XRS (single frequency) 
Trimble 4700 (dual frequency) 
Trimble GPS TS 4800 (dual frequency) 
SOFTWARE 
ASPEN (acquisition and navigation) 
PATHFINDER OFFICE (differential correction) 
GPSURVEY (phase processor) 
The dual frequency receivers were used to compute very 
accurate co-ordinates adopted in the validation of results from 
Pro XR/XRS receivers and as MASTER station. 
The software Aspen was used by the operator during the 
acquisition on the road, allowing to monitor different 
parameters, such as the satellite constellation and the status of 
satellite correction, to insert quickmarks and features and to 
display corrected co-ordinate and the trajectory. 
The performance of three different survey modes was 
investigated by means of the following preliminary field 
experiments executed with non-dedicated vehicles: 
Testl - Static GPS in Real Time with RTCM-104 correction 
transmitted via OMNISTAR to Pro XRS receiver; 
Test2 - Differential GPS in Post-Processing with a Rover Pro 
XR receiver and a 4700 Trimble receiver as Base 
Station; 
Test3 - Differential GPS in Real Time with RTCM-104 
correction transmitted via OMNISTAR to Pro XRS 
receiver. 
The Post Processing differential mode was supported by a 
MASTER station located in a selected site by the Centro 
Rilevamento Dati of the Company Autostrade. The reference 
point was monumented on the roof of a building and precisely 
measured by means of a static session using two dual frequency 
receivers. 
3.1 TEST 1: Accuracy assessment of Pro XRS -RTCM 
corrected position (transmitted via satellite) 
The aim of this test was to define the absolute accuracy of co 
ordinates determined by the Pro XRS receiver operating with 
RTCM-104 satellite transmitted correction (via OMNISTAR). 
The receiver was placed at the Reference Point DITS, located 
on the roof of the Department 37 of the University "La 
Sapienza" of Roma, which position was already known with 
millimetre accuracy. The period of acquisition was five hours 
long with a sampling interval of 30 seconds. More than 600 
points were successfully collected providing horizontal 
accuracy of about 70 cm (Figure 2). The bias observed in the 
NE direction can be adduced to signal disturbances effective on 
the site. 
Figure 2 TEST 1 Distribution of points measured in a static 
survey using RTCM satellite transmitted correction. 
3.2 TEST 2: Performance of Post-Processed corrected 
DGPS 
This test was carried out along 3 kilometres of the urban 
highway Roma EST. The route was covered twice back and 
forth, including a cloverleaf connection, in order to examine the 
consistency and reliability of the computed trajectory.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.