It is worthy of note that there is no elevation
between the lake plain and the Progo gorge.
Therefore, this incision can only have started
after the beginning of the emptying of the lake.
The Progo river must have been able to (re-) estab
lish its course at its present position, before the
formation of this (antecedent) gorge.
Further downstream, towards the debouchure of the
K. Elo, the Progo river shows incised meanders, but
still in a gorge-like setting. The uplift has
affected at least the sector of the K.Progo from
the K.Tangsi to the K.Sileng debouchures. As
pointed out earlier, the ’bulge’ noted by Schmidt
(1934) starts even further downstream, at the
Krasak debouchure.
From this discussion it will be clear that we
consider the uplift leading to the incision into
the lake plain, different from and younger than the
uplift ascribed to slipfaulting of the Merapi
deposits against the Menoreh Hills.
As stated in para 5, also the Sileng had estab
lished its course prior to the uplift. Its incised
nature is clearest in the eastern part of the plain
and decreases in the upstream direction.
This uplift may also be responsible for the south
ward bends in the lower reaches of the Blongkeng,
Pabelan and Elo rivers (fig 1).
These bends actually increase the length of water
way to the local base level (K.Progo), to which the
channels’ debouchures are not adjusted either. This
anomaly is likewise explained by this uplift.
7. PHASING
Based on the aforegoing, the following mor
phogenetic phasing in relation to the ’Borobudur
Lake’ is arrived at:
1. Merapi fluviovolcanics reach the andesites of
the Menoreh Hills. As the deposit grows in
extent and thickness, this leads at one stage to
local folding-crumpling of the front of the
mountainfoot of the Menoreh Hills, which were
already buried under the Merapi fluviovolcanics.
This may be considered the result of slipfault
ing in the Merapi body (van Bemmelen,
1949).
2. Blocking of the drainage creates a lake at the
place of the present Borobudur plain, limited to
the north, ultimately, by the Sumbing deposits
of that time.
3. The lake has had various phases of expansion and
retraction, and may at times have been quite
extensive.
4. The lake must have existed- at least south of
the Borobudur- for a considerable period:
borings near the Borobudur show more than 10
metres of lake deposits ( Purbohadiwidjojo and
Sukardi, 1966 ).
5. Local faulting trending northeast followed at
the place of the p esent sector of the K.Tangsi
running northeastward. Relative uplift in the
south-western block caused the straight incision
of the Kali Progo. This was preceded by a reduc
tion of the lake whereby K.Progo - thus far
flowing into and out of the lake- could re
establish its course.
6. The late-lake phase, really a stage in its
draining, gives rise to the wide drainageways
shown as LD in figs 4. In places, two different
levels can be discerned, slightly differing in
height. The lowest is then indexed -1, the
other, higher one, -2. These drainageways are
very characteristic for the present Borobudur
plain, and their pattern resembles that of
flatfloored gullies in a lowland coastal plain
as e.g. found in northern West-Java.
7. The uplift noted in 5) took place in three major
phases, causing incised meanders of K.Sileng and
K.Progo upstream of their confluence: at least
two major terrace levels can be distinguished,
marking places of relative rest in the uplift.
The uplift also caused the southward bends in
the courses of the K. Pabelan and K. Blongkeng,
from southwest to due south.
8. The events as outlined above have led to the
present morphological appearance of the area.
8. DISCUSSION
Van Bemmelen (1949) postulated that the Gendol
Hills (fig.l) must have slid down from the Merapi
crater area in a catastrophic eruption which he
places in 1006 AD. He considered that the slip-
faulting in the Merapi body might be of the same
age.
From what was said in para 7, it will be evident
that we consider the whole train of events leading
to the origin and later dwindling of the ’Borobudur
Lake’ as much older. The whole sequence must,
however, be of Quaternary, and probably late-
Quaternary age, as it started only when the Merapi
deposits had extended as far as the foot of the
Menoreh Hills.
Assuming a linear relationship between the height
of the Merapi and the areal spread of its deposits
in time (which may be debatable), the Merapi would
have had a height of about 2100 metres a.s.l at the
time when its deposits reached the foot of the
Menoreh Hills (i.e. the position of the Gendol
Hills), as against its present height of 2911
metres.
If a further assumption is made for parallel
growth, in time, of all sections of cone, midslope
and footslope of the volcano, then the total volume
of the Merapi body, at that time, would have been
roughly half its present volume.
Accepting van Bemmelen’s postulation that the
further growth in mass and weight has ultimately
led to slipfaulting and to folding of the front of
the Menoreh Hills (now buried) with associated
uplift or upwarping, then this event has to be
placed well into the second half of the lifespan of
the Merapi, i.e. the second half of the Quaternary.
The question of whether the Gendol hills have slid
from the summit area in the catastrophe of 1006 AD,
or much before that time, does not take a central
position in the context of the present paper.
However, events as reconstructed here point to a
much older date for this event also.
The draining of the lake, in its turn, was in
itiated and/or followed by a phase of uplift with
incision and terrace formation. In other words: a
considerable length of time has elapsed after the
draining of the lake, before the present morphology
came into shape.
These conclusions do not preclude the possibility
that the political and socio-economic fabric of the
ancient Central Javanese Mataram kingdom was
weakened sufficiently by volcanic activity, com-