itional method for
ig to the obtained
.ni (1985) .
■pe of image stem
: regional study it
l recognize the ae-
.c elements. A part
olution provided
mt (the latter
lain tectonic
:t faults) are hi-
. high plain to the
ns of this type
k of details pro-
difficult to de
contradictory .
appears linked to
orms although they
t movement. Vast,
7 further impeded
, those in F.C.C.
ter number of
y eroded areas or
edimentation, ele-
work, etc.. This
s characterizing
tational and hy-
greater contrast
urrounding areas,
those areas pre-
and 7 LANDSAT
entification of
hese same images
some characteris-
uch as: planime-
extrapolating re
nted photoalign-
Panchromatic black and white photomosaic
This photographic support, which was to integrate the
data drawn from the LANDSAT images, proved only par
tially useful. In fact, in the high plain area, it did
not provide any more data than did the SLAR images.
It only provided useful integrating images for neo-
tectonic qualification of the photoalignments in the
Cordigliera areas.
5 CONCLUSION
The black and white band 7 LANDSAT images proved la
cking in information due to their inability to iden
tify features which could, with any certainty, be at
tributed to recent tectonic movement. In comparison,
the F.C.C. LANDSAT images provided more morphotectonic
elements although these were not sufficient to neo-
tectonically qualify the photoalignments. The SLAR
images proved most useful in detailed study. The sca
le factor and improved ground resolution led to the
identification of new basic patterns as well as ele
ments accompanying the main trends which had emerged
through the LANDSAT images.
All the above contributed to better defining the
nature of the features, especially in regard to neo-
tectonic. This thanks to the identification of the
morphology and associated lesser structural elements
as well as the unmistakable identification of layers
and lithological limits.
On the other hand, the photomosaic proved most use
ful in the Cordigliera areas. It would have been pos
sible to glean further elements by stereoscopically
studying each individual photogram. This is especially
true for the identification of morphological elements
linked to a lack of altimetric continuity.
In conclusion it may be asserted that a regional
study of this type requires the analysis of both
"small scale" or limited resolution and "larger scale”
or higher resolution images. This is so because no
neotectonic conclusion can be draw from an initial
wide observation and identification of photoalignments.
Nor can they stem from a subsequent check and classi
fication. They must, rather, be derived from the ob
servation of local morphoneotectonic elements which
only high resolution images can provide.
REFERENCES
, especially in
r ground resolu-
elief conformation
to identify nume-
e previously iden-
e precise neotec-
ade it possible
ich were essen-
r. They proved
cloud or plant co-
DSAT images,
in areas where
f this type of
extensive areas
Panizza, M. & al. 1978. Esempi di morfoneotettonica
nelle Dolomiti occidentali e nell'Appennino modene
se. Torino. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 1:28-54.
Panizza, M. & Piacente, S. 1978. Rapporti fra Geomor
fologia e Neotettonica. Messa a punto concettuale.
Torino. Geograf. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 1:138-140.
Panizza, M. & Castaldini, D. 1985. Morphoneotectonics
Analysis for applied studies. Atti Meeting I.G.U.
Working Groups Morphotectonics Geomorphological Sur
vey and Mapping. Czechoslovakia.
571