937
Table 2. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE CRIES-AGRO-
ECONOMIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - MULBUD
ty
23
DEPARTMENT
Atr Val Atr Val
4 5
precipitation, relative humidity, wind
velocity, solar radiation, sowing dates, crop
selection, length of growing stages, soil
texture, relevant water table characteristics
on the root zone, and root growth over
various growing stages.
98481 { 1394 J
; :
loo.oo : loo.oo ¡
22.16 : 0.32 :
22.16 ; 0.32 :
51512 I 494 :
52.31 ! 35.44 !
57.42 1 0.56 !
11.59 1 0.12 !
36381 1 900 !
36.95 I 64.57 J
43.69 S 1.09 !
8.19 i 0.21 :
8419 ! 0
8.55 ! 0.00
4.56 ¡ 0.00
1.90 ! 0.00
2169 i 0
2.21 S 0.00
2.51 J 0.00
0.49 ! 0.00
If the data base is not established, the user
is provided with a data management option
facilitating data input and editing for
selected locations. Data requirements
include: location identification,
temperature, precipitation, relative
humidity, wind velocity, solar radiation,
sowing dates, crop selection, length of
growing stages, soil texture, relevant water
table characteristics on the root zone, and
root growth over various growing stages. In
combination with other CRIES-RIS modules and
the established data base, the YIELD model
provides the user with the analytical
framework to evaluate physical and socio
economic attributes by location, and
determine the comparative advantage of sites
for cropping alternatives.
PORTION OF TWO-
RAINFALL AND
The CRIES-AIS-YIELD module was developed to
provide agronomists, land use planners,
resource managers and policy analysts with a
low cost, micro computer-based analysis tool
in resource assessment studies. A summary
description of the model is provided belok
(Table 1):
Table 1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE CRIES-AGRO-
ECONOMIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - YIELD
rease
the
grid
e
cells
in
user-
es raster
files
m e n t s
(under
ut of
the
CRIES
оVided
below:
C INFORMATION
sleeted modules
'ormation Systen
T or AT micro-
jerating systei
point processor,
lULBUD modu 1 es,
d from "Yield
bos and Kassai
. was developed
ws (1985) and
>del.
ity to predict
nb er of food and
d locations and
mode 1, can be
>ase containing
yield response
ica1 zones or
tes. If the data
iser is provided
n facilitating
for selected
ents include:
temperature.
(CRIES-AIS-YIELD)
• MODIFIED AFTER D00RENB0S ET AL. "YIELD RESPONSE TO
WATER" FAO
• INCORPORATES THE "WAGENINGEN METHOD" (BASED ON
SLABBERS AND THE WIT) FOR ALFALFA, MAIZE, SORGHUM AND
WHEAT.
• INCORPORATES THE AGR0-ECOLOGICAL ZONE METHOD FOR
LARGE AREA YIELD PREDICTIONS OF 26 CROPS.
« COMPUTER MODEL PREDICTS YIELD RESPONSE TO WATER
AVAILABILITY UNDER RAIN-FED OR IRRIGATED CONDITIONS.
• PROVIDES QUANTIFICATION OF VARIOUS CROP YIELD FOR
AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES
• MODEL HAS FIVE PHASES (FOUR CURRENTLY IMPLEMENTED)
-PHASE 1: DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM POTENTIAL YIELD
(Ym) OF ADAPTED CROP VARIETY ASSUMING NO LIMITING
GROWTH FACTORS (E.G. WATER, FERTILIZER, PESTS, AND
DISEASES)
-PHASE 2: CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
(ETm-PENMAN) WHEN CROP WATER REQUIREMENTS ARE FULLY
MET BY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY.
-PHASE 3: COMPUTATION OF ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
(ETa) BASED ON FACTORS AFFECTING CROP WATER
AVAILABILITY.
-PHASE 4: CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED YIELD (Ye) BY
EVALUATING CROP WATER REQUIREMENTS, WATER SUPPLY AND
RESPONSE FACTORS AT VARIOUS STAGES OF PLANT
DEVELOPMENT.
•INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING CROPS: ALFALFA, BANANA, BEAN,
CABBAGE, CITRUS, COTTON, GRAPE, GROUNDNUT, MAIZE,
OLIVE, ONION, PEA, PEPPER, PINEAPPLE, POTATO, RICE,
SAFFLOWER, SORGHUM, SOYBEAN, SUGARBEET, SUGARCANE,
SUNFLOWER, TOBACCO, TOMATO, WATERMELON, AND WHEAT.
5.2 The CRIES - AIS - MULBUD Model.
Farming systems, representing land
utilization options and regional or national
aggregates, need to be evaluated with regards
to their optimum performance characteristics
and resulting socio-economic benefits derived
under alternative land use and development
policy scenarios. Typical production options
in developing countries can be characterized
as variations of mixed cropping systems,
representing multiple enterprises and their
(CRIES-AIS-MULBUD)
* ADAPTED FROM ETHERINGTON AND MATTHEWS, 1984
* PERMITS ECONOMIC APPRAISAL OF A SINGLE FARMING
SYSTEM CHARACTERIZED BY MULTIPLE AND INTERCROPPING
PRACTICES AS TYPICALLY FOUND IN THE (SUB)TROPICS.
* PERMIT THE EVALUATION OF LAND USE/PRODUCTION
OPTIONS OVER A PERIOD OF TIME BASED OF ANNUAL AND
PERENNIAL CROPS, AGRO-FORESTRY SYSTEMS AND LIVESTOCK
PRODUCTION OPERATED AS A MULTIPLE ENTERPRISE ON A
SINGLE LOCATION (FARMING SYSTEM UNIT).
• MODEL INPUTS INCLUDE: LABOR OPERATIONS AND COSTS,
WAGE RATES AND LABOR AVAILABILITY, DISCOUNT RATES,
TERMINAL VALUES, FERTILIZER, PLANT MATERIAL,
CHEMICALS, PRODUCT TYPES AND PRICES, LAND USE
INDICES.
• MODEL OUTPUTS: GRAPHICAL DISPLAY OF LABOR
REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS, MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS AND
VARIABLE COSTS, GROSS AND NET REVENUES, NET REVENUE
PER LABOR UNIT, SUM OF NET PRESENT VALUES,
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR VARIABLE DISCOUNT RATES,
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURNS, PROFILE OF LAND USAGE WITH
TIME.
Table 3. CRIES-AIS-YIELD model, Example of
Phase I Output for Bananas.
OUCS - MKKCONOHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
YIELD GENERATOR (CRIES - AIS - YIELD)
MICHIGRN STATE UNl^RSITY, EAST LANSING, Ml 48623
COUNTRY NATO JAMAICA CROP TYPE: BANANA TROPICAL LATITUDE: 18.01(4*1)
POL./ACM. DISTRICT: ST. CADOIIC TEAR OF ORIGIN: 1*2 HEMISPHERE: NORTTCRN
ICATTCR STATION NAfC: WORTHY PARK GROWTH PERK»: 2/15/1*2 TO 12/30/1*2 AWRAGE ALT I TUBE: 59.06U)
RESOURCE PROO UNIT OR PROO POTENTIAL (BUT: 1.12 TINE INCREMENTS (<T): 3 (*ys>
AGRO-ECOLOGICAL KBC: 11
PHASE t: DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM POTENTIAL YIELD (Yu).
T HTH/DAY GROSS DRY MATTER PRODUCTION STANDARD CROP - (k?/lu) GROSS DRY NATTER PRODUCTION POTENTIAL YIELD
(DAYS) ни t*Ul «« « *v*rc**t <Uy « *« cl**r 4*y w « ******** cMT«ctl«fls §***««*»**** ******* (kg/Ht) h*w
<*bs«l (cm* Ubsol (cum (tbs*I < cum (pr<xi (cleud (1«tf (iwt (lurvt (*bs*lut< <cum
cb»**) clung«) dung*) dung«) dung«) dung«) r*t*) g*rc) *f** f) f) U4«x) dung«) dung*)
5 2/15 2341.
10 2/20 2383.
15 2/25 2426.
20 3/2 2469.
25 3/7 2512.
30 3/12 2556.
35 3/17 2599.
40 3/22 2641.
45 3/27 2684.
50 4/ 1 2728.
55 4/6 2771.
60 4/11 2815.
65 4/16 2824.
70 4/21 2810.
75 4/26 2795.
80 5/ 1 2779.
15 5/6 2763.
90 5/11 2746.
95 5/16 2770.
100 5/21 2821.
105 5/26 2873.
110 V31 2925.
115 6/ 5 2977.
120 6/10 3030.
125 6/15 эоео.
130 6/20 3129.
135 6/25 3179.
140 6/30 3221.
2341. 994.
4724. 1011.
7150. 1028.
9619. 1044.
12132. 1061.
14687. 1078.
17286. 1094.
19927. 1109.
22611. 1124.
25339. 1138.
281 И). 11S3.
30925. 1168.
33750. 1179.
Э6560. 1186.
39354. 1194.
421Э4. 1202.
44896. 1209.
47643. 1217.
50413. 1222.
53234. 1224.
56108. 1227.
59032. 1229.
62009. 1232.
65039. 1234.
68119. 1235.
71248. 1234.
74426. 1234.
77647. 1233.
994. 1901.
2005. 1929.
3032. 1956.
4077. 1984.
5138. 2011.
6216. 2039.
7310. 2064.
8419. 2088.
9542. 2112.
10681. 2136.
11834. 2160.
13002. 2183.
14181. 2202.
15367. 2216.
16561. 2231.
17763. 2245.
18972. 2260.
20189. 2274.
21411. 2283.
22635. 2289.
23861. 2294.
25090. 2299.
26322. 2305.
27556. 2310.
28791. 2311.
30025. 2309.
31259. 2307.
32492. 2Э05.
1901. 50.11
3830. 50.78
5786. 51.44
7770. 52.11
9782. 32.78
11820. Я. 44
13885. 54.11
15973. 54.78
18085. 55.44
20220. 56.11
22390. 56.78
24563. 57.44
26765. 57.93
28*1. 58.41
31212. 58.89
33457. 59.37
35717. 59.85
37992. 60.33
40275. 60.70
42564. 61.07
44858. 61.44
47157. 61.81
49462. 62.19
51772. 62.56
54083. 63.30
56392. 64.04
58699. 64.78
61004. 65.00
.48 .48 .50
.49 .48 .50
.Я .48 .50
.50 .48 .50
.51 .48 .50
.51 .48 .50
.32 . 48 .50
.52 .48 .50
•Я .48 .50
.Я .48 .30
.Я .48 .50
.54 .48 .50
.Я .48 .50
.Я .48 .50
.59 . 48 .50
.61 .48 .50
.62 .48 .50
.64 . 48 .50
.63 .48 .50
.62 .48 .50
.61 .48 .Я
.59 . 48 . 50
.58 .48 .50
•Я .48 .50
.56 . 48 .Я
.Я .48 .Я
.54 . 48 .Я
.Я .48 .Я
Я. Я.
Я. 113.
61. 353.
62. 415.
63. 478.
64. 543.
65. 606.
67. 675.
68. 742.
68. 810.
67, 877.
67. 945.
67. 1011.
66. 1078.
66. 1143.
66. 1210.
68. 1278.
69. 1347.
70. 1417.
71. 1488.
73. 1Я1.
74. 1635.
75. 1710.
76. 1786.
77. 1864.
products produced over a period of time. The
MULBUD model (Etherington and Matthews, 1985)
permits appraisal of land use options over a
period of time and their derived socio
economic benefits on a sustained basis.
A summary description of the MULBUD model is
provided (Table 2).
Important features of MULBUD include the
ability to: specify variable cost <>f inputs
(labor and materials) and total projet value
by time period/production cycle (stason and
year) for selected enterprises, produce
graphical displays of seasonal labor
requirements versus net revenues generated,
conduct sensitivity analysis on discount
rates and changes in material costs and gross
revenue, and provide summaries of variable
costs, returns and net present values at
user-defined discount rates.