the measured spectral response profiles of the
ASAS channels. Thus, an attempt was made to define
an arbitrary but perhaps more realistic bandpass
profile. The profile spans 0.045 micrometers and
is 0.015 micrometers across at the half-maximum
points (Figure 1). The same profile was applied
to all 9 ASAS channels used in this study. The
results of the 5S runs are given in Table 2 under
the heading "5S BAND (PROF)".
Discussion of Results
The results given in Table 2 are portrayed in
Figure 2. In addition to the 5S results, the
values obtained after atmospheric correction using
the code of Fraser et al. (1989) monochromatically
at NASA are also indicated for comparison. The
general trend of all four of the surface
reflectance spectra is characteristic of
vegetation, increasing from the chlorophyll
absorption minimum at lower wavelengths up to the
infrared plateau. However, the monochromatic
calculations from 5S (LAMBDA GRID) and from the
code of Fraser et al. yield anomalously high
values of surface reflectance in the vicinity of
the narrow oxygen absorption feature at 0.762
micrometers. The bandpass results should be more
representative of the situation that actually
obtains during a measurement in the ASAS channels,
and this is borne out by the improved results in
the region of the oxygen band.
There also appears to be a slight over-prediction
of surface reflectance around 0.722 micrometers
where there is some absorption due to water
vapour. If a moister atmosphere were to be used
in the 5S runs (a mid-latitude summer profile, for
example), the bump in the spectrum at 0.722
micrometers would be considerably higher,
especially in the monochromatic case but also in
the bandpass cases. The bandpass cases are also
affected because the water absorption feature is
less narrow than the oxygen feature and occupies
a greater proportion of the ASAS bandpass. The
point to be made here is that the proper
atmospheric correction of high spectral resolution
data in absorption regions depends on a good
knowledge of the relevant gas content at the time
of data acquisition. This reguirement is more
critical for the more variable gases such as water
vapour, and less critical for other gases such as
oxygen which is less variable. (Note that some
gas profile data were obtained on the ASAS over
flight day, but the US62 standard atmosphere
profile was used for convenience in this study.)
Finally, it should be noted that the surface
reflectance retrieval necessarily assumes that the
wavelength calibration of the sensor is good. The
effects of spectral shifts on sensor response have
been addressed by Suits et al. (1988) and Teillet
(1990).
FURTHER INSIGHT
Of all the parameters involved in the atmospheric
correction process used in surface reflectance
retrieval, the exoatmospheric solar irradiance,
E«,(A), and the two-way gas transmittance, x„(A),
have the greatest spectral variability. More
specifically, the formulation used to obtain
surface reflectance from apparent radiance at the
sensor includes a factor of [E„( A)x a (A) ]~ x in the
multiplicative term (Teillet, 1989). In spectral
regions where there is significant gas absorption,
x„(A) can become very small and hence the multi
plicative atmospheric correction coefficient can
become very large. This is necessary in order to
retrieve the surface reflectance which will have
been severely attenuated in such absorption
regions. However, the predicted surface
reflectance will be rather sensitive to uncertain
ties in x a (A). Thus, if there is no information
available on gaseous absorption at the time of
image data acguisition and standard values are
used in the atmospheric correction, the retrieved
surface reflectances can potentially depart
significantly from normal values in spectral
regions affected by absorption.
The guantity [E„( A)x„( A) ]"' was plotted as a
function of wavelength in order to illustrate
where problems might occur (Figure 4). The values
were obtained from special runs of the 5S
atmospheric code. The gas transmittance includes
absorption by water vapour, ozone, and oxygen.
Most of the spikes of higher value are due to
water vapour and the narrow spike at 0.762
micrometers is due to oxygen. Figure 4 shows the
effect of degrading the spectral resolution from
0.005 micrometers to 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04
micrometers, using the filter profile described in
Figure 3. Apart from the general smoothing of the
spectrum, it is interesting to note how the narrow
oxygen feature is greatly diminished with decreas
ing resolution. This explains the ASAS results
described earlier in that a monochromatic calcula
tion near the oxygen feature will use too large a
value of [E„( A)x a (A) ]" 1 compared to the value that
would obtain in a 0.015-micrometer bandpass.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The narrowness of imaging spectrometer bands
implies greater sensitivity to spectrally-
selective atmospheric absorption features. To
study this effect, surface reflectances were
retrieved from ASAS data using monochromatic and
bandpass atmospheric computations. It was found
that anomalous results for surface reflectance can
be obtained in the vicinity of absorption features
in the monochromatic case whereas bandpass cal
culations yield better results. Even with
bandpass computations, the retrieved surface
reflectances can depart significantly from normal
values in spectral regions affected by absorption
if there is no information available on
atmospheric conditions at the time of image
acguisition.
ACKNOWI.EDGEMENTS
The author wishes to thank G. Fedosejevs and A.
Kalil for assistance with the preparation of the
manuscript.
REFERENCES
Fraser, R.S., Ferrare, R.A., Kaufman, Y.J., and
Mattoo, S. (1989), Algorithm for Atmospheric
Corrections of Aircraft and Satellite Imagery,
NASA Technical Memorandum 100751, NASA Goddard
Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.
Irons, J.R., Ranson, K.J., Williams, D.L. and
Irish, R.R. (1989), Forest and Grassland Ecosystem
Studies Using the Advanced Solid-state Array
Spectroradiometer, Proceedings of the 1989
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium (IGARSS'89) and the Twelfth Canadian
Symposium on Remote Sensing, Vancouver, B. C.,
pp.1761-1764.
580