Full text: CMRT09

In: Stilla U, Rottensteiner F, Paparoditis N (Eds) CMRT09. IAPRS, Vol. XXXVIII, Part 3/W4 — Paris, France, 3-4 September, 2009 
RGB aerial image extracts 
Initial watershed segmentations 
Improved watershed segmentations 
Figure 5: Results of simple building scenes. Again, the 
gray-shadowed regions have been merged on the basis on 
geometric properties. 
in a preprocessing step, e. g. (Zhao and Lei, 2006). A fur 
ther improvement should be acchieved, if the whole proce 
dure is repeated, because the MDL-based merged regions 
are now big enough for determination of their geometric 
properties. 
The noise of the point cloud, which we derive from the 
semiglobal matching does not disturb the merging of im 
age regions. Considering aerial images, we are faced with 
large and often planar objects. There, our plane estimation 
is good enough, because we do not have to many outliers. 
Otherwise, the plane estimation should be done by a robust 
estimator. If different object parts have been segmented 
as one region, then the most dominant plane of the com 
bined region often does not represent one of these object 
parts. This shows us, that we need to focus in the future 
on an algorithm for detecting multiple planes (e. g. analy 
sis of the best five planes from RANSAC) and a splitting 
routine. Furthermore, there are objects as trees or dorm 
ers which violate our assumption of having one planar sur 
face. Therefore, we consider to adapt our plane estimation 
towards extracting general geometric primitives as planes, 
cylinders, cones and spheres, cf. (Schnabel et al., 2007). 
With respect to facade images, we have big trouble with 
our plane estimation. We ascribe this fact to two major 
reasons. First, the reconstruction part is challenged by ho 
mogenous facades and mirroring or light transmitting win- 
Figure 6: Facade image and different views on fitted planes 
for hand-labeled object parts. Wall components are drawn 
in yellow, windows in blue and (if opened) in green, bal 
cony parts in magenta. The planes of overhanging build 
ing parts are well distinguishable, but the window planes 
(if not opened) are very close to its surrounding wall parts. 
The mirroring and light transmission effects in the window 
sections lead to geometrically instable plane estimations. 
dows. Both cases lead to too many outliers. And secondly, 
the noise of the complete point cloud is too high to differ 
between planes in the object space, which are parallel, but 
only a view centimeters apart. Fig. 6 shows a facade image 
and three views on the dominant planes of given annotated 
objects. In this case, the supporting points may have a dis 
tance of 4 cm to the fitting plane. Dominant planes with 
distances of more than half of a meter are clearly separable 
from each other. 
7 CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK 
We presented a novel approach for improving image seg 
mentations for aerial imagery by combining the initial wa 
tershed segmentation with information from a 3D point 
cloud derived from two or three views. For each region, 
we estimate the most dominant plane, and only the plane 
parameters are used to trigger the merging process of the 
regions. With respect to building extraction, our algorithm 
achieves satisfying results, because the ground and major 
building structures are better segmented. 
In the next steps, we want to search for multiple planes for 
each region, and we want to implement a splitting routine, 
so that regions can either get merged or split. If we have 
such a reliable function, we would start the region merging 
using the MDL criterion based on the image intensities. 
So, we can search for geometric descriptions in all, and not 
only in the big image regions. Furthermore, our approach 
215
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.