Full text: Reprints of papers (Part 4a)

Would require vethugy 
© construction oy lle) te 
line point in ever 
nt of suppl 
hy 
y Second Qt 
émentary y. 
ordinates, it js quite gi 
ust be correcteq for the f 
n APR data (infrared oll 
ex equipment, Distances y 
Were suprisingly good, i va 
pment (chiefly Uncertainty 
id only graphical Dlotting i 
i 
Du 
reoplanigraph (8, 4 den] 
t. It was the first flight vi 
y because of Very al 
drift of about 20°, very Iy 
ning camera, ete.) the pf 
spite of it, the mean Sq 
in x was — 53 m A ti 
not entirely developed anii 
rtical photographs only, 
as carried out by the Phi 
of short radar profile Tli 
was flown at the altitude 
A, f = 153 mm. For oblig 
was extended from Renfıer, 
egion is flat. At about 2 f 
vwa River, which at this port 
nsecutive photographs oly: 
visible 1). In order to brilg 
out 11,000 m altitude md: 
the photographic strip un 
ort central portion was nui 
rom a different altitude 
quality, but infrared olli 
take, a camera not refocusel 
unsharp images. 
as done on an A7 Autogal 
cedure of relative oriental 
| method. The work wa: je 
; was replaced. 
» 6 pairs from an altitude 
nd one horizontal point & 
the necessary check poils! 
     
      
    
    
    
      
    
   
   
   
    
   
    
   
    
    
   
  
  
  
   
300 km 
300km 
300km 
300 
  
  
oo 
  
  
200 
  
o 
99 999 
8m (Axial points) 
e 
t6 4m 
o 
Mo. 
Fig. 5. 
x 
ERRORS IN Y 
ERRORS IN X 
  
150 
ERRORS IN ELEVATION 
  
o p 
9 P 
9o 
0000°°° 
Ec o 
  
o 
qn8$89 9$. 599 
oo T 
o o 
8 8m 
° 8 
o 
o 
o 
088 
50 km 
cB 
50 km 
T 
50 km 
50km 
  
  
  
  
Errors i Elevation 
  
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.