SER e
A PR AR
TE RU EE
FRE AED AER Cm
PTT VT EEE S
= 2 > pe = a 08 a Nhi
: " 2 nl BSR an Ll ileal lin, an
casses edi
aliai M PRET nl
Table 14. Scale and azimuth errors in a ten-model grid-
triangulation in 4j
Table 15. Scale and azimuth errors in a ten-model grid-triangulation in
m
Coordinate differences TT 4
T
In the O-system Scale Aümy |
; In the errors (%,,) m |
Distance grid net Alt I Alt II (deg |
4x 4y 4x 4y 4x 4y pr
mm mm mm mm mm mm | AIT | AIT Alt | yy I
2 > nl
00'— 00” 0,00 | 480.00 | + 0.16 | 480.04 | + 0.16 | 480.04] 0.00 0.00 |
01’— 01" 0.00 | 480.00 | + 0.12 | 479.93 | + 0.12 | 479.98 | — 0.23 — (33 000 0
12'— 12" 0.00 | 480.00 | -- 0.07 | 479.82 | + 0.16 | 480.04 | — 0.46 0.00 i ly
23'— 23" 0.00 | 480.00 | + 0.02 | 479.71 | + 0.16 | 479.93 | — 0.69 — 033 m 00
94'— 34" 0.00 | 480.00 | — 0.03 | 479.60 | + 0.20 | 480.04 | — 0.92 0.00 % big
45— 45" | 0.00 | 480.00] — 0.08 | 479.49 | + 0.16 | 479.93 | — 1.15 | — 033 ll
56’-— 56” 0.00 | 480.00 | — 0.13 | 479.38 | + 0.20 | 480.04 | — 1.37 0.00 ns M
67— 67" 0.00 | 480.00 | — 0.17 | 479.27 | + 0.16 | 479.983 | — 1.60 — 0.93 on *
18'— 78" 0.00 | 480.00 | — 0.21 | 479.16 | +- 0.20 | 480.04 | — 1.83 0.00 — 00; Uy
89— 89" | 000 | 480.00| — 0.24 | 479.04 | + 0.16 | 479.98 | — 208 | — 093 2 1] *1i
910'—910^" 0.00 | 480.00 | — 0.28 | 478.93 | + 0.20| 480.04|—2831| 000 - 0 "
Af
Alt I Alt II
Distance Jg Scale Azimut Scale Ad
Pene errors errors Venet errors un
9 [oo degree "oo degree
00'— 00" 220.10 0.00 0.00 219.96 0.00 000
01'— 01" 220.10 0.00 — 0.01 219.83 — 0,59 — 00
12'— 12” 220.12 + 0.10 — 0.04 219.95 — 0.05 +001
23'— 23" 219.94 — 0.73 — 0.06 219.85 — 0.50 - (02
94'— 34" 219.95 — 0.68 — 0.08 219.93 — 0.14 t 041
4D'— 45” 219.96 — 0.64 — 0.10 219.88 — 0.36 - 00
56'— 56” 219.90 — 0.91 — 0.10 219.91 — 028 +00
67'’— 61" 219.85 — 1.14 — 0.14 219.88 — 0.36 +001
78'— 78" 219.75 — 1.59 — 0.16 219.99 + 0.14 +00
89'— 89” 219.69 — 1.86 — 0.18 219.85 — 0.50 +00 |
910' —910" 219.62 — 2.18 — 0.18 219.94 — 0.09 +004 |
points (00°
and 910°). The result is shown in fig.
21 (Alt. I and II), showing fl
magnitude and direction of the errors after the fitting. The errors are statedi
mm in the
grid.
In this case, too, the variations in the scale and azimuth of the different mode
were examined by studying the connection lines of the models, and the res
is shown in table 15. The table shows directly that the conditions for determin
the scale and azimuth of the O-system with the aid of isolated azimuth-determiné
bases are much more favourable for Alt. II. It is particularly important thi
in this case a strip is obtained with as small scale variations and curvature à
possible, since the triangulation is graphic, all adjustments thus being dilficil
62
1 mn
—m—
05m
Fig, 21. PI
every othei
W A
In rece
with the
scribed a
and prive
lakes anc
The ends
the sprin
from 4,00
in the pa
minations