Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B7)

increased 
ity of two 
reservoir, 
he type of 
( 
x 
> 
und in the 
Pistia sp. 
(floating 
us sp. Will 
ine roots, 
to 15 cm 
the most 
ith stands 
of 1 to 2 
Since the 
> areas arc 
the water 
  
   
   
^ b) CAN ue - 
ure 2. a) Scirpus sp.; b) Eichhornia sp.. 
3. METHODOLOGY 
3.1 Data Acquisition 
From April 14 to 16, 1992, the Brazilian National Institute for 
Space Research (INPE), in co-operation with the European 
Space Agency (ESA), the Canadian Centre for Remote Sensing 
(CCRS) and Centrais Elétricas do Norte (ELETRONORTE) 
carried out an experiment in the Tucurui reservoir, to assess the 
feasibility of using SAR data to map aquatic vegetation. The 
campaign included acquisition of multiviewing and 
multipolarization data, in the Nadir mode, taken by the Convair 
580 SAR C-band System, from CCRS, over the inlets named 
Pucuruí and Repartimento in the Tucurui reservoir. The swath 
width of the Nadir mode is 20 km and the incidence angles are 
between 20°-74°. Details of the campaign are found in 
Wooding and Zmuda (1993) and Novo et al. (1995). 
The characteristics of SAR data used in this investigation are 
presented in Table 1. According to Hawkins and Teany (1993), 
the data acquired during the SAREX 92 mission were submitted 
to relative calibration. The calibration constants were 
empirically determined using corner reflectors deployed near 
Ottawa, Canada. These data were collected just before and soon 
after the mission, in order to assess the stability of the system. 
ERS-1 calibration data were then used to adjust the SAREX 
data. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Frequency 5.3 GHz 
Wavelength 5.66 cm 
Polarization HH, VV, HV, VH 
Mode Nadir 
Incidence angle of test area 38° - 50° 
Pixel size 4m x 4.31m 
Resolution 6m x 6m 
Number of looks 7 
  
  
  
  
Table 1. SAR characteristics. 
The whole calibration equation suggested by Hawkins and 
Teany (1993). The INPE processed images have as output the 
amplitude values (A), given by: 
529 
Fcal( j)- Fcal 
A - JDN? (ij) - DN,?(j) id 2) (1) 
where: 
- DN(ij) is the pixel value at row i and column 7; 
- DN,(j) is the noise value at column j; 
- Fcal(j) is the calibration factor at column j. 
  
- Fcal is the mean value of the calibration factor. 
The equation used to convert the digital numbers (DN) into 
backscatter values (6°45) was: 
6° = 10 log,, A> + Fcal Q) 
Aerial photographs at the scale of 1:10 000 were acquired 
concurrently to the SAREX 92 mission and used as ground 
truth. A digital mosaic of 12 aerial photographs was registered 
to the SAR image. The mosaic was also used to set the limits of 
selected samples from different species. The number of samples 
(n) from each class was proportional to their occurrence in the 
reservoir. The classes studied are: Open water, Dead tree, 
Forest, Eichhornia sp., and Scirpus sp.. For every sample the 
mean and the standard deviation of the digital number were 
computed in the four polarizations. Each mean digital number 
  
was converted into 6° through equation (2). Values of Fcal 
for each polarization are presented in Table 2. 
  
HH - -48.660118 
VV = -48.40868 
HV = -45.51140 
VH = -45.634056 
  
  
  
  
  
Table 2. F cal values. 
The coefficient of variation was calculated for all classes using 
the digital numbers. 
3.2 Correction Factor 
The data presented cross-polarization dB values not compatible 
with that reported in the literature and neither consistent with 
radar theory in C band. The cross-polarization backscattering 
dB values were higher than the like-polarization. Hence, a 
correction factor (k) was computed. It is formulated as follows: 
  
PA FH 159 13 106/65 26-2755 giqp (3) 
where, 
N 
ZH; + VV;) 
À vH-vv = i5 = 1.3 dB (4) 
N 
were Avy VA is the mean variation in all classes 
distinguished from SAREX data. This mean variation 
represents how large are HV data compared to the VV data. 
S- VV-HV = 66dB (5) 
where VV and HV are the mean values, in C band, for the 
following classes: shrubs, short vegetation and grasses, at an 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.