Symposium on Remote Sensing for Resources Development and Environmental Management / Enschede / August 1986
835
Abandoned settlements and cultural resources remote sensing
Aulis Lind
University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
Noel Ring
Big Ben Community College Overseas Program, New York, USA
ABSTRACT: It is becoming increasingly clear that resource planning and management in many countries of the
World includes a range of settlement features having origins from prehistoric times. Such features, which are
collectively termed cultural resources, may be endangered by the continued development of other resources and
thus need to be included in monitoring aspects of land use studies. In addition, there is the need to survey
developable and remote areas for such resources relating to former human settlements whether agglomerated or
dispersed. Remote sensing applications involve the discovery, survey, mapping, and analysis of the abandoned
landscape elements as well as the current functional elements. The existing variety of remote sensing tools
provides the promise of identifying new cultural resource landscapes or districts. At the same time, archival
sources of data, such as old aerial photographs, are particularly valuable. Thus, thematic mapping with empha
sis on cultural resources, becomes a multisensor task with numerous other remote sensing dimensions including
data from satellites, aircraft and baloons. Examples of applications from the U.S., Europe and S.E. Asia are
presented to illustrate the complexity and scope of the remote sensing challenge.
1 INTRODUCTION
News of an exciting discovery has recently emerged
(Begley S. and S. Katz, 1986) which describes aNew
World Pompeii on the slopes of the Costa Rican vol
cano Arenal, where airborne radar, lidar and color-
infrared photographic sensing were employed to locate
abandoned settlements and appropriate sites for
archaeological excavations. The advantages of the
aerial perspective and aerial photography to docu
ment abandoned settlements are well known to students
of past landscapes. As the search for abandoned set
tlements and the study of relict landscapes pro
gresses, the roles played by remote sensing continue
to expand due to ongoing research, development and
application of new remote sensing tools and methods.
Satellite remote sensing programs such as LANDSAT,
the Spaceborne Imaging Radars-SIR A, B, and the newly
launched SPOT system offer some new and challenging
directions for past landscape analysis (Olsen, 1985) .
Ancient settlement patterns are often submerged in
the landscape of recent history, and these overlap
an environmental matrix of resource significance.
The inventory and analysis of these spatially over
lapping patterns forms a significant focus for several
fields of study including, for example, environmental
archaeology, historical-cultural geography and human
ecology. Emerging from the application of remote
sensing techniques within these fields, and within
site-oriented archeaological surveys, is an expanding
and increasingly significant area of investigation
which has appeared as "cultural resources remote
sensing". The application of satellite remote sensing,
radar, multispectral imaging and the tools of the
computer and space age offer to greatly increase
information about bygone populations and their works.
Perhaps more importantly, abandoned settlements as
well as such features as ancient agricultural tracts,
early irrigation and transportation canal networks,
fortifications, and religious centers are considered
to be resources which specifies that they are a matter
of inventory, conservation, and management as mean
ingful parts of the economy of nations, states,
regions, or locales. Conserving and managing the
current mass of cultural resources (Reichstein, 1985)
and providing for new organizational and planning
schemes to handle such features as historic districts
and relict landscapes (Melnick, 1984) are of major
concern due to the destructive threats of such pro
cesses as urban expansion, reservoir construction,
mining and the landscape manipulations associated
with modernization of agriculture and forestry.
Remote sensing's role within cultural resources
management will continue to receive increasing atten
tion since its approach is archaeologically and envi
ronmentally non-destructive and this is an increasingly
important attribute. Moreover, Federal laws in the
U.S. at least require surface surveys to be made.
But, the amount of effort expended and the rate of
progress achieved ultimately depends on the amount
of funding available, the interest level of investi
gators and the relative importance given to cultural
resources as a whole by society. Cultural resource
managers sometimes view remote sensing studies with
skepticism, but that is mainly the result of improper
or misapplied use and interpretation of remote sensing
data, or simply a lack of knowledge regarding remote
sensing methods and techniques. Both of these problems
become a matter of education and training within the
appropriate sub-disciplines.
What are the remote sensing elements and challenges
in the development and management of cultural resources
that may offer global societies some understanding of
their evolution? Posing this question from time to
time seems necessary to assess the nature of the
challenges lying ahead, especially as rapid advances
in remote sensing technology ultimately impact on
methodological approaches. This paper attempts to
examine that question by: a) surveying major cultural
resource tasks within the context of a scaled approach
and b) exploring the nature of remote sensing applica
tion potentials within selected regional contexts.
2 SCALING OF CULTURAL RESOURCES TASKS
Application of remote sensing techniques to cultural
resources problems involves a potentially broad spec
trum of scales and sensing tools. It might be diffi
cult to find another field of study which requires a
range of remotely sensed data stretching from scales
of about 1/1000 to 1/1,000,000. An examination of
scale in a bivariate context is a convenient way to
identify application dimensions, along with other
characteristics of cultural resources remote sensing.
This is attempted in Table 1 to follow. While scale
speaks for itself, definition of the major tasks and
an indication of the tools generally used is required