geological map /Pig,7/ the parallel displacement of 
the lineaments corresponding faults might be observed. 
The faot itself can be explained in a different way, 
namelyj 1 - only a part of the really existing faults 
has been reoognized and drawn on the geologioal map, 
2 - the faults could have displayed different chara 
cter i.e. an interpreted fault might be only an idea 
lized image of the wider zone of parallel fault pla 
nes, only one of which reaches the surface, 3 -several 
parallel faults oould accompany the main one on the 
surface as the traces of the seoond order faults, an 
tithetic faults etc., 4 -in the interval from the deep 
horizon up to the present surfaoe there oould have 
oocured a refraction of the fault surfaoe due to the 
ohanges in lithology what has affeoted an inclination 
of the fault plane and finally resulted in different 
location of the traces of this plane in the different 
stratigraphic horizons and recent surface as well. 
In the NE side of the Kock horst anticline there 
occurs a distinct trend of the Landsat lineaments pa 
rallel to the main fault of the structure under dis- 
oussion and their shifting north-eastwards /Pig.7/. 
Since the seismic data interpretation /Zeliohowski 
1972/ suggests possibility of NE inclination of the 
whole Kook horst anticline it is not to be excluded 
that the parallel "shifting" might reflect this asym 
metry. Discussion ooncerns the faults seen beneath 
800m below the present surface. Taking such an inter 
pretation into acoount the fault surface under discus 
sion would be Inclined /dipped 60°SW/. 
It must be repeated here that the coincidence bet 
ween geological recognition of the interpreted area 
in the different regions and Landsat lineament pat 
terns increases with the better geological recogni 
tion. That is why the remote sensing Landsat linea 
ments pattern in the region south-westwards from the 
Kock horst anticline /i.e. in Stoozek-Dorohuoza de 
pression distinctly worse recognized/ does not corre 
spond to the hitherto proposed Palaeozoic fault model. 
It seems to be possible that in this region Landsat 
lineaments correspond to the deformations caused by 
the younger Alpine movements, whioh have not reached 
Palaeozoic horizon. Still since the geological infor 
mation might be not complete the disoussion there has 
rather academic character. 
The observed fact that the satellite lineaments 
distinctly correspond to the changes of coal-potential 
in the discussed depression seems to be, however, one 
of the most interesting/Fig.13/. 
Basing on the ooincidenoe of the main satellite li 
neaments and coal-potential isolines, as well as those 
transversal ones which reflect the shifting and direc 
tional ohanges of these isolines it might be suggested 
that sedimentary Carboniferous trough was already af 
fected by long-active, synsedimentary movements. 
Landsat lineaments suggest that also Stoczek-Doro- 
hucza depression might be stronger faulted them it re 
sults from the present structural map. The proposed 
interpretation of the remote sensing data applied to 
the coal basin recognition demands, however, to be 
checked in the further geologioal recognition of ooal 
deposits. 
7 PINAL REMARKS 
As it seen from the faots above a distinct coincidence 
between Toros radar lineaments, satellite Landsat ones 
and the geologioal structure of ICB ocours. Radar li 
neaments seem to be connected with not deep-lying 
structural horizon /the top surface of brittle Mesozo 
ic and Lower Tertiary sediments/ and might have some 
significance for the further geologioal recognition 
of the oap rocks of the coal-bearing sediments. 
Prom the other side Landsat lineaments correspond to 
the geological structure of the Palaeozoic series 
whioh oontains the coal-bearing sediments. Such the 
relation is so distinct that basing on the standard 
geological methods and the remote sensing techniques 
a creation of a certain model of the structure of the 
Figure 13. Landsat lineament pattern and coal-poten 
tial ohanges* 1 -lineaments, 2 -coal-potential isoli 
nes Aindly was made available by Zdanowski and Porzy- 
cki in 1983/. 
area might be postulated. Such the model might be - 
in particular - in case of Lublin coal basin quickly 
checked and verified due to the progressive develop 
ment of the black-coal deposit. 
In general - the model itself - can be applied to 
improve the geological recognition of the other coal 
basins with a comparable geological setting. 
REFERENCES 
Bojkowski, K.kJ.Porzycki 1980. Geological problems of 
coal basins in Poland. Warszawa, Wyd.Geol. 
Henkiel, A. 1983. Tektonika./Tectonics. In Cainozoio 
of Lublin Coal Basin.Symposium in Lublin, 9-11.IX/, 
Kenozoik Lubelskiego Zaglqbia Wqglowego. Lublin, 
UMCS, p. 41-6*1. - /In Polish only/. 
Malinowski, J. &J.E.Mojski 1978. Arlcusz Lublin. Mapa 
Geologiczna Polski 1;200 000 /Sheet Lublin. The Geo 
logical Map of Poland, 1:200 000/, Warszawa,Inst. 
Geol. - /Explanation in Polish only/. 
Mojski, J.E. 1968. Arkusz luk6w. Mapa Geologiczna Pol 
ski 1:200 000 /Sheet Iuk6w. The Geological Map of 
Poland, 1; 200 000/. Warszawa Inst.Geol. /Explana 
tion in Polish only/. 
Ryka, W. 1983. Map of ore mineralization signs in cry 
stalline basement rocks 1;500 000. In Atlas of the 
geological structure and mineral deposits in the Lu 
blin region, Table 39. Warszawa, Inst.Geol. 
¿elichowski, A.M. 1972. Rozw6j budowy geologicznej ob- 
szaru mi^dzy Gdrami Swiqtokrzyskimi i Bugiem /Eng 
lish summary; Evolution of the geologioal structure 
of the area between the G6ry Swiqtokrzyskie and the 
river Bug/. Bull.IG, 263. Warszawa, Inst.Geol. 
Zelichowski, A.M. 1983. Tectonic map 1:500 000. In At 
las of the geological structure and mineral deposits 
in the Lublin region. Table 34. Warszawa, Inst.Geol.