dered
in an
about
Ith of
s is a
ale is
ler in
using
[rates
point
make
ically
oló' s
^ the
re of
e two
to the
rome
ically
kable
on in
sarest
patial
nakes
al or
anner
ect;
we have made the angular stepwidth vary from 6 to 15 Mgon,
optimising it according to the different parts’ features. A highest
resolution (6 Mgon) has been applied to scan the most
elaborated parts in order to obtain an accuracy of 1.0 cm
5
whereas a medium resolution (10-15 Mgon) with a 2.5 cm step
has been considered enough to measure simple surfaces that did
not present any ornaments.
Fig. 7 — Lower part of altar's point cloud.
The aim of our resarches was to obtain a full 3D model
comprehending the texture information too. So that we
simultaneously acquired both the geometrical data (by laser
scanner) and the texture ones (by a digital camera).
To reconstruct the whole model we used the 3D modelling
software Surveyor developed by 3Dveritas. It registers point
clouds in a global coordinate frame, integrates multiple scans,
and generates high-precision polygonal models from the range
data.
Fig. 8 — Wireframe mesh
In particular, the point cloud was processed in order to decimate
some redundant informations (e.g. all the point lying in a plane)
and to characterize all the mouldings of the columns’ basement,
capitals, architrave, tympanum and statues. This way we
obtained a very accurate triangulated wireframe mesh model
ready to be mapped with digital images.
Furthermore, choosing different crossing planes, we obtained
various profiles of longitudinal, oblique and transversal cross
sections.
Fig. 9 — Textured mesh of the altar
The 3D model obtained is a documentation as complete as
possibile of the studied architectural object, since it can contain
different kinds of information, both geometrical and about
colour, x-ray, thermal, infrared.
Fig. 10 — Textured mesh
Nowadays the research is still in progress. During the next
months, we will be able to obtain more complete results: in this
framework we offer the processings handled so far.
The gained experiences confirm that technology’s development
and its application permit to obtain images metrically correct.
So we can consider surveying operation as a repeatable
scientific experiment, whose result can be compared to the
previous one so as to be reliable: that is why scanner laser
surveying can gain quality survey certification.
—293—