4
The plane transformations for the study of the
deformations
In the study of the view, the planimetric part was
separated from the altimetric part, so that the information
regarding the elevations were studied and evaluated
separately. Even considering the view as a perspective
construction based on geometric data surveyed directly or
extracted from previous charts, the data on the elevations
would result in not being easily worked with together with
the planimetric data.
Considering, rather, that the attachment of the buildings to
the ground, the canal side walkways and the canals
themselves (places where the reference points have been
positioned) lie practically on the same plane, the view of
de’ Barbari, relative to this plane, can be considered as
the transformation of a planimetry of the city. Or rather, it
is possible to obtain a view which corresponds
geometrically to the city in the 1500’s, taking an
orthogonal projection of the city and modifying it according
to a certain rule; that rule is a plane transformation.
The main problem was to understand what type of
transformation it was better to use. The plane
transformations can be divided into two large families: the
global ones and the local ones. The first ones apply the
same rule of modification to the entire chart, completing a
transformation on the basis of different parameters. In
other words, the first group of transformations
corresponds to a rigid deformation while the second to an
elastic deformation.
In the first case, on the basis of control points
(approximately 120 have been identified throughout the
city), those parameters have been estimated to the least
squares which best are adapted to the points used. The
study of the dimension and the distribution of the residuals
of points is fundamental, as these allow for the
identification of the zones of the map with the greatest
deformations. Among the various applicable and
presented transformations (for example, conform,
polynomial, affine) the projective transformation with eight
parameters has been chosen. This transformation is equal
to the central projection of one plane on another, that is, in
our case, to the placing in prospective of a planimetry.
From this application, it was possible to evaluate the
shifting of the view of Jacopo de’ Barbari from a rigorous
central projection.
Therefore, we proceeded with the inverse operation:
applying a projective transformation to the prospective
view in order to obtain the hypothetical plan of Venice in
1500. Even in this case, the result obtained emphasised
the great differences between the historical chart and the
current map.
In the case of the local transformations, rather, each point
of the map is transformed according not to general fixed
parameters, but to variable parameters which are
calculated on the basis of nearby control points. To this
second type, the transformations for finite elements
belong as well as the local transformations based on
points or lines (usually called point based warping and
feature based warping). In plain words, the local
transformation allows to transfer the geometry of the
reference chart to the one to be transformed.
Superimposing a regular grid to the photoplane of Venice
and mapping it onto the view through a transformation to
finite elements, a representation of the current city of
Venice is obtained with the geometric characteristics of
the 1500’s produced work. From the comparison with the
correct prospective of the same photoplane (previously
obtained from the projective transformation) the
modifications by the author can then be seen.
In an analogous way, it was possible to reconstruct the
planimetric image of Venice from the 1500’s, or rather, by
mapping the view onto the photoplane.
From the combined application of the transformation to
finite elements and of the projective transformation, the
elaborations have been realised which have led to modify
the view, returning it, for the planimetric part, to a correct
central projection.
fig 7 Finite elements transformation: applying this transformation, the new image of the photoplane obtained has the same geometry of
the de' Barbari one. The irregular deformation of the grid underlines that the view is not a correct perspective.
fig8 de
view ant
What i
first ph
The vie
presen
deform
“desire
perspe
to a qu
The ai
de’Barl
constri
map w
consol
Barbar
and w<
indeed
appare
dilated
institut
those |
definec
which
summi
would
planim
New t(
The trz
allow f
make 1
anothe
the ch;
which
origins
historic
can be
This si
resean
to reac